Single Point Continuity - Spivak Ch.6 Q5

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of single point continuity as presented in Spivak's text, specifically focusing on the formal definition of discontinuity at a point. Participants are exploring the implications of continuity and discontinuity in mathematical functions.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking, Exploratory

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are questioning how to formally negate the definition of continuity and define discontinuity at a specific point. There is also exploration of different functions that exhibit continuity only at certain points, as well as the implications of approaching a point through sequences.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants offering various perspectives on continuity and discontinuity. Some guidance has been provided regarding the use of sequences and open sets in understanding continuity, although no consensus has been reached on the specific definitions or implications.

Contextual Notes

There is a mention of a homework template requirement, and participants are encouraged to adhere to it. Additionally, the discussion includes constraints such as the prohibition of division by zero in the Math section.

Physics news on Phys.org
Miguel said:
Hey Guys, I posed this on Math Stackexchange but no one is offering a good answering. I though you guys might be able to help :)

https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/3049661/single-point-continuity-spivak-ch-6-q5
The idea is: No matter how close (##\delta##) you get to ##x=a##, there is always a positive distance (##\varepsilon##) such that there are image points (##f(a),f(x)##) at least so far from another.

Can you formally negate the definition of continuity, i.e. formally define what it means to be discontinuous at ##a\,?##
 
@Miguel, in future posts, please do not delete the homework template. Its use is required here for homework questions.
 
There are many variations of this problem, another one is

##f(x) = \left\{\begin{array}{c}x,\hspace{20pt}x\in\mathbb{Q}\\-x,\hspace{20pt}x\in\mathbb{R}\setminus\mathbb{Q}\end{array}\right.##

which is continuous only at ##x=0##.
 
@Miguel: There is also a notion of continuity through sequences and their convergence*: f is continuous at x iff ##( x_n \rightarrow x) \rightarrow (f(x_n) \rightarrow f(x)) ## Can you see what happens as you approach a Rational or Irrational through a sequence? What happens when x=a? You may also want to consider the open set definition: Consider an open set in the target space (ban open interval). What is its inverse image under this map. Is ihe inverse image open **?*This is not valid for all spaces, but it is for this one
**This is really not the pointwise definition, but I think it is a nice exercise.

EDIT: Miguel: We don't allow division by 0 in the Math section. You must get an upvote quickly to avoid the 1/0 in your Avatar ;). .
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
6K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K