Single-slit diffraction and small angle approximation

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the distance from a slit to a screen for observing diffraction patterns and determining the width of the central maximum. Given a light wavelength of 587.5 nm and a slit width of 0.75 mm, the first minimum occurs 0.85 mm from the central maximum, leading to a calculated distance of 0.0109 m from the slit to the screen. The width of the central maximum can be determined using the formula w = (λL)/d, but the user is uncertain about their calculations for part b. The small angle approximation is applied to relate the slit width and the observed diffraction pattern. Clarification and confirmation of the calculations are sought to ensure accuracy.
konto77
Messages
13
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Light of wavelength 587.5 nm illuminates a single 0.75 mm wide slit. (a) At what distance from the slit should a screen be placed if the first minimum in the diffraction pattern is to be 0.85 mm from the central maximum? (b) Calculate the width of the central maximum.
Use the small angle approximation.

lambda = 587.5 nm
y=0.85 mm
a=0.75 mm

Homework Equations



y=L*lambda/a

The Attempt at a Solution



I easily found part a to be L = 0.0109 m. But i am having trouble finding out part b.

I tried 2*0.0109 m = .0218 but i don't know if that's right since i don't have the answer.




Any help is appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The central maximum of the diffraction pattern from the slit subtends an angle ##\Delta \theta =\dfrac{\lambda}{d}## where ##d## is the slit width. In the small angle approximation, the width of the maximum on the screen is ##w=L~\Delta \theta=\dfrac{\lambda~L}{d}.##
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
8K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
990
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
9K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K