Sketching Region R Bounded by Curves: A Homework Problem

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves sketching the region R bounded by the curves y = x, x = 2 - y^2, and y = 0. This is part of a broader integral problem related to finding areas and volumes generated by rotating the region.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the appropriateness of rewriting the equation x = 2 - y^2 in terms of y and question the implications of doing so on the setup of the integral. There are considerations about the behavior of the functions for negative values and the nature of the area being calculated. Some participants suggest that changing the representation could simplify the math, while others explore the equivalence of areas between different forms of the equations.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active with participants sharing insights and questioning assumptions about the functions involved. Some guidance has been offered regarding the setup of integrals, particularly in relation to the shell and disc methods, but no consensus has been reached on a single approach.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating the constraints of the problem, including the requirement to indicate methods for setting up integrals without performing the integration. There is an emphasis on understanding the geometric implications of the curves involved.

Jimbo57
Messages
96
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Sketch the region R bounded by the curves y = x, x = 2 - y^2 and y = 0.

This is the initial part of an integral problem and I'm just curious about the method here.

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



So, would it be proper to take the x = 2 - y^2 function and write it in terms of y as the dependent variable? ie, y = sqrt(2-x)

I believe the graph looks the same but for setting up the integral, would it change anything?

Thanks!
Jim
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You should sketch out ##x=2-y^2## just to be on the safe side.
i.e. ... what happens to x for negative values of y?
In ##y=\sqrt{2-x}## can y ever be negative?
If x > 2, y is imaginary - but in the original form, x cannot be bigger than 2.
When you change over like that these are things you have to think about.

It may not matter this time, since your other bound is y=x - but note that it is easier to change that one to x=y.

I suspect the objective is to find an area - in which case it is reasonable to change to any representation that has the same area and a good idea if it gives you easier math. I don't think the surd does that for you, but swapping the roles of x and y will ... just do ##\int f(y)dy##.

Put it another way - is the area enclosed by x=2-y^2 and y=x the same as the area enclosed by y=2-x^2 and x=y?
 
Simon Bridge said:
You should sketch out ##x=2-y^2## just to be on the safe side.
i.e. ... what happens to x for negative values of y?
In ##y=\sqrt{2-x}## can y ever be negative?
If x > 2, y is imaginary - but in the original form, x cannot be bigger than 2.
When you change over like that these are things you have to think about.

It may not matter this time, since your other bound is y=x - but note that it is easier to change that one to x=y.

I suspect the objective is to find an area - in which case it is reasonable to change to any representation that has the same area and a good idea if it gives you easier math. I don't think the surd does that for you, but swapping the roles of x and y will ... just do ##\int f(y)dy##.

Put it another way - is the area enclosed by x=2-y^2 and y=x the same as the area enclosed by y=2-x^2 and x=y?

Yep, I see exactly what you're talking about. One is a horizontal parabola and the other is just half of one. I redid my work, keeping it in the original form. It actually made it seem easier too. Any chance you could proof my work Simon, or anyone else? Thanks for your help btw!

The second part says: Indicate the method you use to set up the integrals (do not integrate) that give the volume of the solid generated by rotating the region R around:

i: the x-axis
ii: the y-axis
iii: the line x = -2
iv: the line y = 1

For i:

Using cylindrical shells,
C = 2∏y
A = 2∏y((2-y2) - y)
v = 2∏∫(2y-y3-y2)dy for y = [0,1]

For ii:

Using the disc method,
A = ∏(2-y2)2 - y2)
v = ∏∫(2-y2)2 - y2)dy for y = [0,1]

for iii,

Using the disc method,
A = ∏((2-y2 + 2)2 - (y+2)2)
V = ∏∫((4-y2)2 - (y+2)2)dy for y = [0,1]

for iv,

Using shells,

Same as i:
C = 2∏y
A = 2∏y((2-y2) - y)
v = 2∏∫(2y-y3-y2)dy for y = [0,1]
 
I redid my work, keeping it in the original form. It actually made it seem easier too.
When you get over the idea that the x and y-axis have to have a particular use, it does often get easier.

I will advise you to learn LaTeX for writing equations ;)

Your approach appears to be that of applying definitions and equations.
That's not how I would construct an integral - but you know your course.

The bounded region is the positive part of the parabola with a wedge-thing cut out of it.
For 1 - shell method check.

##x=y## intersects ##x=2-y^2## at (x,y)=(1,1)
##x=2-y^2## intersects ##y=0## at (x,y)=(2,0)
so 0<y<1 and 0<x<2.

a shell radius ##y##, thickness ##dy## and height ##h(y)## has volume ##dV=2\pi y h(y) dy##
##h=x_2-x_1## is bounded above by ##x_2=2-y^2## and below by ##x_1=y##
##\Rightarrow h(y) = 2-y^2 - y##

so the volume is $$V=2\pi \int_0^1 y(2-y^2-y)\; dy$$

Looks like what you have ... notice how I have more detail about how I got things.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K