What are the Steps to Solve a Skew-Symmetric Matrix Problem?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Kolahal Bhattacharya
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Matrix
Click For Summary
To demonstrate that the trace of the product of a symmetric matrix A and a skew-symmetric matrix B is zero, one approach involves using the properties of the trace. The discussion highlights that while the proof attempts to show this through summation notation, it lacks sufficient justification for certain steps. Participants suggest that leveraging algebraic properties of the trace could simplify the proof. Key points of contention include the need for clearer explanations of specific equalities used in the proof. Ultimately, the discussion emphasizes the importance of clarity and justification in mathematical proofs.
Kolahal Bhattacharya
Messages
133
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



I am to show that the trace of the product of a symmetric and a skew-symmetric matrix is zero.Please check what I did is corect:


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



Let me assume:A~=A and B~=-B

(I will use # sign to denote the sum process)

trace(AB)=[#(i)](AB)_ii=[#(i)] [#(j)] a_ij*b_ji

trace(AB)=-[#(j)] [#(i)] b_ji*a_ij using conditions on A and B
=-[#(j)](AB)_jj
Since i and j are equivalent,
what we have is 2trace(AB)=0
hence,conclusion
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A~ means the transpose of A?


I think your proof is right, although you skipped some steps and did not provide justification for what was skipped, so I can't be sure.

I will suggest, though, that you don't need to bother with summations at all: you can just use the algebraic properties of the trace instead.
 
Yes, ~ means transpose.
What are the algebraic properties of trace you are referring to?
also I do not uderstand which steps have I jumped?
Thank you.
 
Kolahal Bhattacharya said:
What are the algebraic properties of trace you are referring to?
The first few equations here


also I do not uderstand which steps have I jumped?
These are the two equalities I take issue with

trace(AB)=-[#(j)] [#(i)] b_ji*a_ij

-[#(j)] [#(i)] b_ji*a_ij=-[#(j)](AB)_jj

They are certainly true, but I don't think they're adequately explained.
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
12K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K