Skewed 3D visualization of E/Z in alkenes

  • Thread starter Thread starter nomadreid
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the challenges of visualizing E/Z configurations in alkenes, particularly with (4Z)-5,6-dichloro-1,4-hexadiene and (1E)-1-chloro-1,5-hexadiene. Participants express confusion about distinguishing between E and Z due to the orientation of substituents in 3D visualizations. There are questions regarding the correct numbering of double bonds when multiple double bonds are present, as well as the representation of angles in diagrams that may mislead interpretations of stereochemistry. Clarification is sought on assigning priorities to substituents around double bonds to accurately determine E/Z configurations. Overall, the conversation highlights the complexities of stereochemistry and the importance of accurate visual representations in understanding alkene structures.
nomadreid
Gold Member
Messages
1,748
Reaction score
243
TL;DR Summary
In the main text is shown diagrams illustrating the concept of together (Z) and opposite (E) sides of a double bond for substituents. But my 3D perception of them do not match up with the correct alignment, so I am obviously looking at them wrong. I also have an easier question about numbering of alkenes.
(Edit: Forgot tags; couldn't go back and re-insert. So, tag: stereochemistry.)
The following 3D visualizations are taken from
https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/compound/4Z_-5_6-dichloro-1_4-hexadiene#section=3D-Conformer

For (4Z)-5,6-dichloro-1,4-hexadiene

Z not E ball.webp
Z not E stick.webp

So I am not sure how to correctly visualize these to distinguish Z and E.

Another example:
First, a side question: in
https://chem.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Organic_Chemistry/Organic_Chemistry_(Morsch_et_al.)/07:_Alkenes-_Structure_and_Reactivity/7.04:_Naming_Alkenes
it is stated
"Start numbering from the end of the parent chain which gives the lowest possible number to the double bond".

But what if there are two double bonds, and starting at one gives the same numbering as starting with the other? For example,
for (1E)-1-chloro-1,5-hexadiene? Here it seems that we are starting from the red, not the purple?
E not Z ball.webp
E not Z sticks.webp

Now returning to the Z/E question, if we are talking about the red part, then the two bonds appear perpendicular -- so this would be neither Z nor E, but it was decided that it is E. Are the angles simply poorly represented in the diagrams?

Finally, I originally had a question about (1E,4Z)-1,5-dichloro-1,4-hexadiene, because in Example
in
https://chem.libretexts.org/Courses/Sonoma_State_University/SSU_Chem_335A/Material_Since_Exam_3_for_the_Final/Unit_7:_Alkenes:_Structure_and_Reactivity/7.05_Alkene_Stereochemistry_and_the_E,_Z_Designation
there is no 3D structure, nor could I find one on the Internet, just the
flat structure.webp

Trying to assemble a 3D structure for this, the E and Z appear to me to be reversed to the correct alignment. So my visualization is missing some key element.

Any help would be greatly appreciated.
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
Can you assign priorities of substituents of the "left" and "right" side of the double bond? Which has a higher priority - L1, or L2? What about R1 and R2? Z means either L1, R1 or L2, R2 are of higher priorities in each respective pair. Is that so?

1747657611370.webp
 
Thank you very much, Borek. Your drawings are very helpful, and a bit of the fog is starting to lift. Let me see if I have this straight. The idea is to look at the two carbon atoms on each side of a double bond, one regards the group with the highest priority on one side, and then the group with the highest priority on the other side, and one compares them to differentiate Z or E. So far, so good; so I was comparing the wrong things. Super! I will work on this some more and be back if I still have difficulties, but this was a big boost.
 
It seems like a simple enough question: what is the solubility of epsom salt in water at 20°C? A graph or table showing how it varies with temperature would be a bonus. But upon searching the internet I have been unable to determine this with confidence. Wikipedia gives the value of 113g/100ml. But other sources disagree and I can't find a definitive source for the information. I even asked chatgpt but it couldn't be sure either. I thought, naively, that this would be easy to look up without...
I was introduced to the Octet Rule recently and make me wonder, why does 8 valence electrons or a full p orbital always make an element inert? What is so special with a full p orbital? Like take Calcium for an example, its outer orbital is filled but its only the s orbital thats filled so its still reactive not so much as the Alkaline metals but still pretty reactive. Can someone explain it to me? Thanks!!
Back
Top