Sliding a cloth beneath a block causing tipping

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter annamal
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Forces
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

This discussion revolves around the mechanics of a block tipping as a cloth is pulled from underneath it. Participants explore the forces and moments involved in this scenario, considering both static and dynamic perspectives. The conversation includes analysis of free body diagrams (FBDs), moments about different points, and the implications of horizontal forces acting on the center of mass (CM).

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants discuss the moments about the normal force and question why there is no counteracting force for the moment from the weight of the block when considering the tipping point.
  • Others argue that for the free body diagram to be valid, a horizontal force must be acting on the center of mass to compensate for the frictional force (Ff), otherwise the block would rotate counterclockwise (CCW).
  • A participant suggests that the normal force would relocate if the block rotates CCW, indicating a misunderstanding of the normal force's position during tipping.
  • There is a mention of the inertial resistance of the block to both linear and rotational movements as the cloth slides underneath.
  • One participant proposes that in a vacuum, sliding the cloth should not cause tipping, while another counters that tipping could still occur in a vacuum.
  • Another participant introduces the concept of angular momentum change and its dependence on the choice of reference point, suggesting that the net moment is not necessarily zero around the tipping edge.
  • There is a request for simpler explanations regarding the relationship between angular momentum and net moments, highlighting the complexity of the discussion.
  • Some participants note the distinction between static and dynamic perspectives, with one emphasizing the need to consider inertial forces in a non-inertial reference frame.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express multiple competing views regarding the forces and moments involved in the tipping of the block. There is no consensus on the mechanics of the tipping process or the role of various forces, indicating an unresolved discussion.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference different frames of reference (inertial vs. non-inertial) and the implications for analyzing the forces and moments. The discussion includes assumptions about the behavior of forces during the tipping process, which remain unverified.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to those studying mechanics, particularly in the context of forces, moments, and tipping phenomena in physics.

annamal
Messages
393
Reaction score
33
TL;DR
If a cloth were slid underneath a block and we take the moment about the tipping point (normal force), why is there no force counteracting the moment from the weight of the block? If we take the moment about the center of gravity, there is the frictional force and normal force countering each other's moments though.
Screenshot 2024-07-03 at 9.37.03 PM.png


For this freebody diagram showing a cloth being pulled from underneath a block, if we take the moment about the normal force:
m*g*L/2 = 0, there is no force counteracting the moment from the weight of the block.

But if we take the moment about the center of gravity:
N*L/2 - Ff*H/2 = 0

How do you explain the fact that taking the moment about the normal force (tipping point) has no force to counteract the moment from the weight of the block?
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot 2024-07-03 at 9.35.24 PM.png
    Screenshot 2024-07-03 at 9.35.24 PM.png
    2.1 KB · Views: 78
Physics news on Phys.org
For the FBD to be true, some horizontal force acting on the CM should be compensating Ff.
Otherwise, the block would tend to rotate CCW, making N to relocate itself to the left bottom edge.

HUBiIjG.gif
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman
Lnewqban said:
For the FBD to be true, some horizontal force acting on the CM should be compensating Ff.
Otherwise, the block would tend to rotate CCW, making N to relocate itself to the left bottom edge.

View attachment 347789
The fbd is for a cloth sliding out from the bottom of the block.
If the block rotates ccw, shouldn’t the normal force be on the bottom right of the block instead?
Correction: If the block rotates ccw, the normal force should be the bottom left of the block.

This doesn’t answer my question that if I take the moment about the normal force location, what force counteracts the the moment from the force of gravity though?
 
Last edited:
annamal said:
The fbd is for a cloth sliding out from the bottom of the block.
From right to left, I assume.

annamal said:
This doesn’t answer my question that if I take the moment about the normal force location, what force counteracts the moment from the force of gravity though?
We are trying to answer your question together
 
Last edited:
Lnewqban said:
From right to left, I assume.



We are trying to answer your question together
Yes there is a cloth sliding from under the block from right to left
 
annamal said:
The fbd is for a cloth sliding out from the bottom of the block. If the block rotates ccw, shouldn’t the normal force be on the bottom right of the block instead?
The fbd represents a cloth sliding, from right to left, out from the bottom of the block, which is tending to rotate CW, as represented.

Assuming the N force was initially located directly under the weight vector, what made it move to the right corner?

If, for any reason, the block instead rotates CCW, shouldn’t the normal force be on the bottom left edge of the block instead?
 
annamal said:
Yes there is a cloth sliding from under the block from right to left.
... and there is a linear inertial resistance of the mass of that block to that forced (Ff) sliding movement.
There is also a rotational inertia inertial resistance of the block to the induced moment and tipping.
Block-tablecloth.jpg
 
Lnewqban said:
For the FBD to be true, some horizontal force acting on the CM should be compensating Ff.
Nice kiss! Is that your girlfriend? (Oh, maybe I should not have asked that...) :wink:
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Lnewqban
Lnewqban said:
For the FBD to be true, some horizontal force acting on the CM should be compensating Ff.
If I slide a cloth from right to left underneath a block, what is the compensating horizontal force on the CM?
Lnewqban said:
Otherwise, the block would tend to rotate CCW, making N to relocate itself to the left bottom edge.
Are you saying that sliding a cloth underneath the block would make it rotate ccw?
 
  • #10
annamal said:
If I slide a cloth from right to left underneath a block, what is the compensating horizontal force on the CM?
Please, see post 7.
Please, note that the CM of the braking motorcycle shown in post 2 is not located directly over the front wheel.
annamal said:
Are you saying that sliding a cloth underneath the block would make it rotate ccw?
Only if sliding it from left to right.

Block-tablecloth CCW.jpg
 
  • #11
I am thinking about this and wondering whether the drag force is what causes the block to tip, so in a vacuum, if you slide a cloth underneath the block from right to left, there should be no tipping.
 
  • #12
annamal said:
... so in a vacuum, if you slide a cloth underneath the block from right to left, there should be no tipping.
No, it could tip over in vacuum too.

annamal said:
How do you explain the fact that taking the moment about the normal force (tipping point) has no force to counteract the moment from the weight of the block?
Because the rate of angular momentum change (= net moment) depends on the choice of reference point. The horizontal linear acceleration of the center of mass constitutes a change of angular momentum around every reference point that is not on the horizontal line through the center of mass (like the tipping edge), so there is no reason to expect net zero moment around such a point.
 
Last edited:
  • #13
A.T. said:
Because the rate of angular momentum change (= net moment) depends on the choice of reference point. The horizontal linear acceleration of the center of mass constitutes a change of angular momentum around every reference point that is not on the horizontal line through the center of mass (like the tipping edge), so there is no reason to expect net zero moment around such a point.
Could you explain that in simpler terms please? I get the angular momentum change = net moment. But then got lost afterwards. I am looking at the block in terms of statics though and you seem to be talking about it in terms of dynamics?
 
  • #14
annamal said:
Could you explain that in simpler terms please?
See Figure 6.1.1c here:
https://phys.libretexts.org/Courses...ntum/6.1:_Linking_Linear_and_Angular_Momentum

What applies to the point particle there, also applies to the center of mass of the block. And if the magnitude of the linear velocity changes, then so does the angular momentum around that reference point shown there.

annamal said:
I am looking at the block in terms of statics though and you seem to be talking about it in terms of dynamics?
In the inertial reference frame the block is accelerating horizontally due to the frictional force. To make it static you would have to adopt an non-inertial reference frame, which involves inertial forces and moments.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
5K
  • · Replies 52 ·
2
Replies
52
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
5K