Slipping before rolling (Rotation)

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a solid disc (cylinder) with mass M and radius R that initially rotates with an angular velocity ω. It is lowered onto a horizontal surface with a coefficient of kinetic friction, μ, and the question seeks to determine the distance the disc travels before it transitions to rolling without slipping.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to derive the distance traveled by applying principles of angular momentum and linear momentum. They express confusion regarding the application of the equation -dL/dt = R dP/dt, particularly the significance of the negative sign.
  • Some participants clarify the relationship between angular momentum and linear momentum, discussing the derivation of the equation and the implications of the negative sign in the context of torque and direction of forces.
  • Others suggest that the confusion over the sign may stem from the transition between vector and scalar forms of the equations involved.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing insights into the underlying physics concepts. Clarifications regarding the application of angular momentum and the interpretation of the negative sign have been offered, but no consensus has been reached on the original poster's confusion.

Contextual Notes

Participants are exploring the definitions and relationships between angular momentum and linear momentum, as well as the effects of friction on the motion of the disc. The original poster's question highlights a need for deeper understanding of these concepts in the context of the problem.

weesiang_loke
Messages
33
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Consider a solid disc (cylinder) with mass M and radius R initially rotates with an angular velocity [tex]\omega[/tex]. Then it is slowly lowered to a horizontal surface with coefficient of kinetic friction, [tex]\mu[/tex]. What is the distance of the disc traveled before it starts to roll without slipping.

Homework Equations


Force, Impulse and One-dimensional kinematic equation, etc.

The Attempt at a Solution


i used -[tex]\frac{dL}{dt}[/tex] = R [tex]\frac{dP}{dt}[/tex]
where L is the angular momentum and P is the linear momentum.

Then i get -[tex]\Delta[/tex] L = R*[tex]\Delta[/tex]P as [tex]\Delta[/tex]t [tex]\rightarrow[/tex]0
so, -I ( [tex]\omega[/tex]f - [tex]\omega[/tex] ) = MR([tex]\upsilon[/tex]f - 0)

after that i change the I into 0.5*M*R^2 and [tex]\upsilon[/tex]f=R*[tex]\omega[/tex]f (condition for rolling without slipping).
So my vf = 1/3 * R *[tex]\omega[/tex].

since the frictional force is M*g*[tex]\mu[/tex], so the acceleration a = [tex]\mu[/tex]*g.

After that i use the linear motion equation: v^2 = u^2 + 2as
so we have (1/3 * R *[tex]\omega[/tex])^2 = 0 + 2*([tex]\mu[/tex]*g)*s
so the distance traveled is ((R *[tex]\omega[/tex])^2) / (18*[tex]\mu[/tex]*g)

The answer is correct.

But actually my question is why can we applied " -[tex]\frac{dL}{dt}[/tex] = R [tex]\frac{dP}{dt}[/tex] " at the beginning especially with that negative sign there. And what is the equation there stands for?

Pls help me because i am really confused here.. Thanks
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The equation arises from the definition of angular moment and is just a statement regarding the conservation of momentum. The definition of angular momentum for a point particle is

[tex]\mathbold{L} = \mathbold{r}\times\mathbold{P}[/tex].

Taking the derivative with respect to time yields,

[tex]\frac{d\mathbold{L}}{dt} = \frac{d\mathbold{r}}{dt}\times\mathbold{P} + \mathbold{r}\times\frac{d\mathbold{P}}{dt}[/tex].

The first term vanishes since the velocity is parallel to the momentum, leaving

[tex]\frac{d\mathbold{L}}{dt} = \mathbold{r}\times\frac{d\mathbold{P}}{dt}[/tex].

Now,for the problem in hand, the cross-product between the force (rate of change of linear momentum) and the position vector, in this case the radius of the wheel is anti-parallel to the angular momentum vector. Hence, the minus sign in your expression.

Does that help?
 
hi weesiang_loke! :smile:

(have a mu: µ and an omega: ω :wink:)
weesiang_loke said:
But actually my question is why can we applied " -[tex]\frac{dL}{dt}[/tex] = R [tex]\frac{dP}{dt}[/tex] " at the beginning especially with that negative sign there. And what is the equation there stands for?

this is really two equations …

the rotational dL/dt = r x F, and the linear F = dP/dt …

together they make dL/dt = r x dP/dt …

in my opinion, trying to work out whether there should be a + or a - when we convert that vector equation into a scalar equation is confusing and pointless :confused:

just say that if the cylinder originally rotates clockwise, then the friction F will be to the right, so the torque is anticlockwise, and the cylinder moves to the right …

ie L decreases while P increases :smile:
 
Thanks Hootenanny and tiny-tim.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
1K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
4K
  • · Replies 60 ·
3
Replies
60
Views
5K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
3K