Slipping before rolling (Rotation)

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
3 replies · 2K views
weesiang_loke
Messages
33
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Consider a solid disc (cylinder) with mass M and radius R initially rotates with an angular velocity [tex]\omega[/tex]. Then it is slowly lowered to a horizontal surface with coefficient of kinetic friction, [tex]\mu[/tex]. What is the distance of the disc traveled before it starts to roll without slipping.

Homework Equations


Force, Impulse and One-dimensional kinematic equation, etc.

The Attempt at a Solution


i used -[tex]\frac{dL}{dt}[/tex] = R [tex]\frac{dP}{dt}[/tex]
where L is the angular momentum and P is the linear momentum.

Then i get -[tex]\Delta[/tex] L = R*[tex]\Delta[/tex]P as [tex]\Delta[/tex]t [tex]\rightarrow[/tex]0
so, -I ( [tex]\omega[/tex]f - [tex]\omega[/tex] ) = MR([tex]\upsilon[/tex]f - 0)

after that i change the I into 0.5*M*R^2 and [tex]\upsilon[/tex]f=R*[tex]\omega[/tex]f (condition for rolling without slipping).
So my vf = 1/3 * R *[tex]\omega[/tex].

since the frictional force is M*g*[tex]\mu[/tex], so the acceleration a = [tex]\mu[/tex]*g.

After that i use the linear motion equation: v^2 = u^2 + 2as
so we have (1/3 * R *[tex]\omega[/tex])^2 = 0 + 2*([tex]\mu[/tex]*g)*s
so the distance traveled is ((R *[tex]\omega[/tex])^2) / (18*[tex]\mu[/tex]*g)

The answer is correct.

But actually my question is why can we applied " -[tex]\frac{dL}{dt}[/tex] = R [tex]\frac{dP}{dt}[/tex] " at the beginning especially with that negative sign there. And what is the equation there stands for?

Pls help me because i am really confused here.. Thanks
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The equation arises from the definition of angular moment and is just a statement regarding the conservation of momentum. The definition of angular momentum for a point particle is

[tex]\mathbold{L} = \mathbold{r}\times\mathbold{P}[/tex].

Taking the derivative with respect to time yields,

[tex]\frac{d\mathbold{L}}{dt} = \frac{d\mathbold{r}}{dt}\times\mathbold{P} + \mathbold{r}\times\frac{d\mathbold{P}}{dt}[/tex].

The first term vanishes since the velocity is parallel to the momentum, leaving

[tex]\frac{d\mathbold{L}}{dt} = \mathbold{r}\times\frac{d\mathbold{P}}{dt}[/tex].

Now,for the problem in hand, the cross-product between the force (rate of change of linear momentum) and the position vector, in this case the radius of the wheel is anti-parallel to the angular momentum vector. Hence, the minus sign in your expression.

Does that help?
 
hi weesiang_loke! :smile:

(have a mu: µ and an omega: ω :wink:)
weesiang_loke said:
But actually my question is why can we applied " -[tex]\frac{dL}{dt}[/tex] = R [tex]\frac{dP}{dt}[/tex] " at the beginning especially with that negative sign there. And what is the equation there stands for?

this is really two equations …

the rotational dL/dt = r x F, and the linear F = dP/dt …

together they make dL/dt = r x dP/dt …

in my opinion, trying to work out whether there should be a + or a - when we convert that vector equation into a scalar equation is confusing and pointless :confused:

just say that if the cylinder originally rotates clockwise, then the friction F will be to the right, so the torque is anticlockwise, and the cylinder moves to the right …

ie L decreases while P increases :smile:
 
Thanks Hootenanny and tiny-tim.