Small mass element for laminar (moment of inertia)

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the calculation of the moment of inertia for a 2D lamina using different formulations of the small mass element, dM. The user initially defines dM as dM = ρdxdy, where ρ is the area density, but later proposes an alternative definition M(x,y) = ρxy, leading to a different expression for dM. The conclusion drawn is that the two formulations yield different results for the moment of inertia tensor, indicating that the mass density ρ must remain constant for accurate modeling in this context.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of moment of inertia in physics
  • Familiarity with calculus, specifically partial derivatives
  • Knowledge of area density concepts in material science
  • Basic principles of laminar flow in fluid dynamics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the derivation of the moment of inertia tensor for various shapes
  • Study the implications of variable density in mass distribution
  • Explore applications of laminar flow in engineering contexts
  • Learn about the use of partial derivatives in physical modeling
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, engineering, and applied mathematics who are involved in modeling physical systems, particularly those dealing with laminar flow and moment of inertia calculations.

jamie.j1989
Messages
76
Reaction score
0
Hi, I was just going over the moment of inertia for a 2D lamina, I've been happy with writing the small mass element dM as dM = ρdxdy where ρ is the area density, but for some reason decided on doing it like this,

M(x,y) = ρxy

so

dM = [itex]\frac{∂M}{∂x}[/itex]dx + [itex]\frac{∂M}{∂y}[/itex]dy
= ρ(ydx + xdy)

This is obviously not the same, and does not give the same answer when substituting in for dM in the moment of inertia tensor. I would like to know if there's a difference between the dM's, and if so why? Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
M(x,y) = ρxy

This means the mass increases with increasing x and y which I don't think is what you want to model. But if it was then ρ is not constant and should be a function of x and y instead.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 49 ·
2
Replies
49
Views
6K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
6K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
8K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K