1. Limited time only! Sign up for a free 30min personal tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Small oscillations on a constraint curve

  1. Apr 2, 2013 #1
    1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data

    From Goldstein Classical Mechanics, 6.16:

    A mass particle moves in a constant vertical gravitational field along the curve defined by y=ax4 , where y is the vertical direction. Find the equation of motion for small oscillations about the position of equilibrium.

    3. The attempt at a solution

    When taking a quadratic approximation as in the standard way to solve small oscillations, the eigenfrequency vanishes, giving a result without oscillation, which is clearly not what I'm looking for. I'm honestly not sure how to proceed with this.
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Apr 2, 2013 #2

    ehild

    User Avatar
    Homework Helper
    Gold Member

    Hi tmode, welcome to PF. Show what you tried in detail, please. How did you take the constraint into account?

    ehild
     
  4. Apr 3, 2013 #3
    Hello, thank you.

    I took the constraint into account by substituting [itex]y=ax^4[/itex] and [itex]\dot{y}=4ax^3[/itex] into the Lagrangian: [tex]L = T-V = \frac{1}{2}m(\dot{x}^2 + \dot{y}^2) - mgy[/tex]
    To yield, without any small oscillation approximation: [tex]L = \frac{1}{2}m\dot{x}^2 (1+16 a^2 x^6) -mgax^4[/tex]
    However, when you try to Taylor expand the [itex]m(1+16a^2 x^6)[/itex] and [itex]mgax^4[/itex] about the equilibrium point x=0 (ie. small x), at quadratic order you get back m in the former and 0 in the latter, resulting in ω=0 for this treatment as a small oscillation approximation, and therefore no oscillation. For the potential, the first non-zero Taylor expansion approximation is the original value [itex]mgax^4[/itex], which would be very small in any case, on the order of x^4.

    Taking the Euler-Lagrange equation to get equation of motion, we end up with [tex]0=m\ddot{x}(1+16a^2 x^6) + 48m\dot{x}^2 a^2 x^5 + 4mga x^3[/tex]
    I don't think this is all the question wants answered, since it's not taking any sort of small oscillation approximation, nor does it give an explicit equation of motion.
     
    Last edited: Apr 3, 2013
  5. Apr 3, 2013 #4

    ehild

    User Avatar
    Homework Helper
    Gold Member

    The equation you derived is correct. I do not see anything you can do more. Even ignoring the terms with x^5 and x^6 it is not an equation for SHM.

    ehild
     
  6. Apr 3, 2013 #5

    mfb

    User Avatar
    2016 Award

    Staff: Mentor

    The motion is not harmonic, why do you expect to find a equation for harmonic motion?

    In first non-vanishing order, we get ##\ddot{x} = -4gax^3##, which is just the derivative of the potential => okay.
     
  7. Apr 5, 2013 #6
    Alright, thanks both of you. In the context of the level of difficulty of the rest of the problems from that chapter, it seemed far too simple leaving it there, seeming like an incomplete solution. Thanks again.
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?
Draft saved Draft deleted



Similar Discussions: Small oscillations on a constraint curve
  1. Small Oscillations (Replies: 1)

  2. Small oscillations (Replies: 2)

  3. Small Oscillations (Replies: 3)

  4. Small Oscillations (Replies: 16)

Loading...