Soft/Stable Movement for Parallelogram Mount with Wheel + Printhead

  • Thread starter Thread starter mc_09
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on enhancing the smooth movement of a parallelogram mount for a printhead, specifically addressing stabilization and shock absorption. The design involves a polyurethane wheel to maintain a consistent gap between the printhead and concrete, but concerns arise about potential rattling and vibration during operation. Suggestions include using dashpots for controlled damping and shock absorption, with a recommendation to provide sketches and details for better hardware selection. The importance of proper mounting for springs or dashpots is emphasized to prevent the printhead from slamming down. Overall, the thread seeks practical hardware solutions to achieve a stable and soft engagement with the concrete surface.
mc_09
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
TL;DR Summary
Designing a parallelogram-mounted printhead that prints onto concrete. Adding a 6" polyurethane wheel to maintain a 0.25" gap and allow smooth movement. Looking for advice on how to prevent vibration/slamming when the wheel contacts the surface — considering springs or dampers, but open to better ideas. Need specific hardware recommendations and mounting tips.
I'm a design engineer, but admittedly not very experienced in mechanical systems. I'm currently working on a project where I need to add smooth, soft movement to a parallelogram mount that supports a printhead. I could really use some guidance from more mechanically savvy folks.

Project Overview:
  • The printhead is mounted to a parallelogram-style arm and will be printing downward onto a sheet of concrete
  • I'm planning to add a 6" diameter polyurethane wheel (labeled Part E in blue) to allow for a smooth transition as the printhead engages with the concrete surface
  • The wheel should keep a consistent 0.25" gap between the printhead and the top of the concrete.
  • The wheel will likely be mounted using an adapter plate (Part D in yellow), which connects to the back of the printhead and also supports the wheel

What I need help with:
1. Stabilizing the Mechanism:
  • When the wheel hits the concrete and lifts the printhead, I want to avoid any rattling or vibration in the mounting.
  • I'm worried about the printhead "slamming down" if the joints are loosened to allow adjustability.
  • Ideally, I want some form of damping or soft control when the wheel engages with the concrete

2. Ideas I'm Considering:
  • I was thinking of adding springs to absorb shock and provide controlled lift/drop but I’m unsure where to mount them or if this is the best option.
  • Open to alternative suggestions

Please provide specific hardware suggestions – part numbers, Amazon/McMaster-Carr links, or product names.
I've labeled all the parts (A–E) for easier reference in the comments/discussion.
Thanks in advance! Happy to provide sketches or more details if needed.

EDIT: I uploaded a back side image a bit more refined
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot 2025-09-04 102903.webp
    Screenshot 2025-09-04 102903.webp
    12.4 KB · Views: 5
  • Screenshot 2025-09-04 120741.webp
    Screenshot 2025-09-04 120741.webp
    12.5 KB · Views: 6
Last edited:
Engineering news on Phys.org
Search dashpots in McMaster-Carr. Dashpots are designed to slow something down for a soft landing. You will need some sort of bracket on your adaptor plate and another bracket on the fixed part of the assembly. If you sketch something up, and provide the drop distance and moving mass, we can help you select the right part. Here's a link: https://www.mcmaster.com/products/dashpots/.

For those not familiar with McMaster-Carr, they are an essential resource for anybody who is looking for information on small mechanical parts.
 
  • Informative
  • Like
Likes Lnewqban and berkeman
Here's a video by “driving 4 answers” who seems to me to be well versed on the details of Internal Combustion engines. The video does cover something that's a bit shrouded in 'conspiracy theory', and he touches on that, but of course for phys.org, I'm only interested in the actual science involved. He analyzes the claim of achieving 100 mpg with a 427 cubic inch V8 1970 Ford Galaxy in 1977. Only the fuel supply system was modified. I was surprised that he feels the claim could have been...
Thread 'Turbocharging carbureted petrol 2 stroke engines'
Hi everyone, online I ve seen some images about 2 stroke carbureted turbo (motorcycle derivation engine). Now.. In the past in this forum some members spoke about turbocharging 2 stroke but not in sufficient detail. The intake and the exhaust are open at the same time and there are no valves like a 4 stroke. But if you search online you can find carbureted 2stroke turbo sled or the Am6 turbo. The question is: Is really possible turbocharge a 2 stroke carburated(NOT EFI)petrol engine and...
Back
Top