Solar Flare Danger: Worst Damages & Preparing for X Class

  • Thread starter Thread starter libbon
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Solar
AI Thread Summary
A significant solar flare, particularly an X-class flare, poses potential risks primarily through associated coronal mass ejections (CMEs), which could severely disrupt satellites, communications, and power distribution on Earth. While direct harm to humans is unlikely, the technological impact could lead to substantial economic losses, estimated at around a billion dollars, due to power outages and communication failures. If a large CME were detected, evacuations of the International Space Station would be necessary to protect astronauts from harmful radiation. NASA and NOAA are expected to provide warnings and guidance if such an event is imminent, although individuals may not need to take specific safety measures beyond basic preparedness. Overall, while the immediate threat to human life is minimal, the reliance on technology makes society vulnerable to the indirect consequences of solar flares.
libbon
Messages
33
Reaction score
0
What could be the worst damages in a very bad solar flare, but a solar flare that's likely to happen in the next couple years with the solar maximum, like a really high x class, what could happen on earth? If NASA or noaa knew about this happening, would they tell everyone, if they would, what would we have to do to be safe from the flare, would they announce a national emergency?

thank so much
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
There are really two questions here. How much damage could a solar flare do on earth? Not much, most of the power lines are now protected, and use of short wave radio frequencies that will be most disrupted has been decreasing for decades.

As for satellites, a big flare can puff up the thermosphere and cause them to deorbit early. However, during the recent quiet sun period, the opposite has happened, so it would average out.

The other possibility though is called a coronal mass ejection (CME). These are associated with solar flares, and if an X class flare caused a CME headed toward Earth it could do a lot more damage to satellites (and humans) in orbit, to communications and to power distribution. Since the CME does not travel at the speed of light, it arrives at the Earth (if it is headed in that direction) one to five days after it leaves the sun.

On 1 September 1859 there was a huge disruption in the Earth's magnetic field. This is thought to be the biggest CME to hit the Earth in recent history. Of course there was no radio, no television, no artificial satellites, and no long range electric transmission. So the only damage was to some telegraph cables.

A CME of that size and speed (it arrived the same day as the associated flare) hitting the Earth today would be on the order of a billion dollars or so.

If a large CME were to be detected approaching earth, the space station would be evacuated, which would be a significant fraction of the total cost. (The radiation would approach or exceed the LD50 dose for humans.) Putting astronauts in orbit is expensive, and some experiments on the space station would be ruined if left unsupervised--especially since there would probably be breakers blown, etc. on the space station.
 
libbon said:
What could be the worst damages in a very bad solar flare, but a solar flare that's likely to happen in the next couple years with the solar maximum, like a really high x class, what could happen on earth?
Not much to humans directly, from what I understand. Had we been living over a couple hundred years ago, before the technological revolution, we probably wouldn't even notice.

But in today's technological era, the outcome might be a little different, indirectly. If major electrical power outages and/or communications systems were disrupted, it could impact humans which have come to depend upon such systems.

Here is a general solar flare Q/A from NASA's Dr. David P. Stern.
http://imagine.gsfc.nasa.gov/docs/ask_astro/answers/971124a.html"

And some related good news is that solar flares may now be easier to predict (and if if they are predicted, it follows that preventative action can be taken).
http://www.noaanews.noaa.gov/stories2010/20100119_solarflare.html"

If NASA or noaa knew about this happening, would they tell everyone, if they would, what would we have to do to be safe from the flare, would they announce a national emergency?
I don't know. But I would think so. They have a track record of being very forthcoming with estimates and warnings of disasters (warnings such as NOAA's report of impending disaster prior to hurricane Katrina striking New Orleans).

But again, there's nothing really you'd have to do to be "safe from the flare." The flare itself won't harm you directly. But it wouldn't do any harm to have water, batteries, and canned food around.

Here are a couple of links to estimates involving space weather and solar flares:

Recent article from NASA:
http://science.nasa.gov/science-news/science-at-nasa/2009/21jan_severespaceweather/"

A space weather FAQ from NOAA.
http://www.swpc.noaa.gov/info/FAQ.html"
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The fossil evidence shows no real evidence of CME or solar flare effects on life. Such an event now could, however, be inconvenient for cell phone users
 
Publication: Redox-driven mineral and organic associations in Jezero Crater, Mars Article: NASA Says Mars Rover Discovered Potential Biosignature Last Year Press conference The ~100 authors don't find a good way this could have formed without life, but also can't rule it out. Now that they have shared their findings with the larger community someone else might find an explanation - or maybe it was actually made by life.
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
14
Views
8K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
5K
Back
Top