1. Not finding help here? Sign up for a free 30min tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Solid State: Electron in periodic potential

  1. Jul 18, 2008 #1
    1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data
    Starting from the wave function of free electron and applying first order approximation of time independent perturbation theory find wave function of electron in periodic potential.

    2. Relevant equations
    Potential energy in reciprocal space
    [tex]E_{p}(\vec{r}) = \sum_{\vec{g} }E_{g}\cdot e^{i\vec{g}\vec{r}}[/tex]

    free electron wave function
    [tex]\phi_{k}(\vec{r})=e^{i\vec{k}\vec{r}[/tex]

    free electron wave function in first order approximation
    [tex]\Psi_{k}(\vec{r})=\phi_{k}(\vec{r})+\sum_{\vec{k}^{'}\neq\vec{k}}\frac{\int\phi^{*}_{k'}(\vec{r})\cdot E_{p}(\vec{r})\cdot\phi_{k}(\vec{r})\cdot d^{3}r}{E(k)-E(k')}\cdot\phi_{k'}(\vec{r})[/tex]

    3. The attempt at a solution

    [tex]\int\phi^{*}_{k'}(\vec{r})\cdot E_{p}(\vec{r})\cdot\phi_{k}(\vec{r})\cdot d^{3}r=\sum_{\vec{g} }E_{g}\int e^{i(-\vec{k'}+\vec{g}+\vec{k})\cdot\vec{r}}d^{3}r=\sum_{\vec{g}}E_{g}\cdot\delta_{\vec{k'},\vec{k}+\vec{g}}[/tex]

    I don't understan the last part , transition from complex exponential to Kronecker delta.
    I have two options:
    1.) When vectors satisfy k'=k+g then I have integral of [tex]\int d^{3}r[/tex] which must be 1, I am not clear about this.
    2.) when vectors k' and k+g are not equal I have integral of [tex]\int [Cos(a) + i*Sin(a)] d^{3}r[/tex]
    (a is some real number from the dot product in exponent) ,
    this integral should be zero, but I dont see how ?
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Jul 18, 2008 #2

    Mute

    User Avatar
    Homework Helper

    Your wavefunction isn't properly normalized. It should be

    [tex]\phi_k(\mathbf{r}) = \frac{1}{\sqrt{V}}e^{i\bm k \cdot \bm r}[/tex]

    So, what results is the integral

    [tex]\frac{1}{V}\int d\mathbf{r} e^{i(-\mathbf{k}' + \mathbf{g} + \mathbf{k})\cdot \mathbf{r}}[/tex]

    If [itex]\mathbf{k}' = \mathbf{k} + \mathbf{g}[/itex], then you just have an integral over the volume of your crystal, so you get V/V = 1.

    If [itex]\mathbf{k}' \neq \mathbf{k} + \mathbf{g}[/itex], then the integral evaluates to

    [tex]\left.\frac{1}{V}\frac{e^{iq_x x}}{iq_x}\frac{e^{iq_y y}}{iq_y}\frac{e^{iq_z z}}{iq_z}\right|_{\mathcal{V}}[/tex]

    where it is integrated over the volume [itex]\mathcal{V}[/itex] and [itex]\mathbf{q} = -\mathbf{k}' + \mathbf{k} + \mathbf{g}[/itex]. Now, the wavevectors k', g and k must take values such that the wavefunction vanishes at the boundary. Since the result is proportional to your wavefunction, it vanishes at the boundary, and the result is zero.

    Hence, if k' = k + g, the integral gives 1; if k' =/= k + g, the integral is zero. We write the result compactly using the kronecker delta [itex]\delta_{k',k+g}[/itex]
     
    Last edited: Jul 18, 2008
  4. Jul 19, 2008 #3
    Thanks for help.
    The case k'=k+g is clear to me now, but I'm still having difficulties with k' =/= k + g.

    I can't make [tex]\left.\frac{1}{V}\frac{e^{iq_x x}}{iq_x}\frac{e^{iq_y y}}{iq_y}\frac{e^{iq_z z}}{iq_z}[/tex] proportional to [tex]\phi_k(\mathbf{r}) = \frac{1}{\sqrt{V}}e^{i\bm k \cdot \bm r}[/tex]
    If q=k then it is proportional, but q=-k'+k+g
     
  5. Jul 22, 2008 #4

    Mute

    User Avatar
    Homework Helper

    [tex]e^{iq_x x} e^{iq_y y} e^{iq_z z} = e^{i q \cdot r} \propto \phi_q(\mathbf{r})[/tex]

    k, k' and g all satisfy the boundary conditions of the problem such that the wavefunction vanishes at the boundary. Since q is just a sum of these [itex]\phi_q[/itex] will also vanish at the boundary.
     
  6. Aug 5, 2008 #5
    I understand transition to Kronecker delta now.
    But I run into more difficulties trying to solve this problem.
    I'll put it aside for now.
    regards Mute.
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?



Similar Discussions: Solid State: Electron in periodic potential
Loading...