Solid State: Electron in periodic potential

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around applying first order perturbation theory to find the wave function of an electron in a periodic potential, starting from the wave function of a free electron. The context involves concepts from solid state physics and quantum mechanics.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the transition from a complex exponential integral to a Kronecker delta, exploring the conditions under which the integral evaluates to 1 or 0 based on the relationship between wave vectors.

Discussion Status

Some participants have clarified aspects of the integral evaluation, particularly regarding the case when the wave vectors satisfy specific conditions. However, there are ongoing difficulties with understanding the proportionality of certain expressions to the wave function and the implications of boundary conditions.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the importance of normalization and boundary conditions in the context of the wave functions being discussed. There are indications of missing clarity on specific mathematical transitions and assumptions related to the periodic potential.

natugnaro
Messages
61
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


Starting from the wave function of free electron and applying first order approximation of time independent perturbation theory find wave function of electron in periodic potential.

Homework Equations


Potential energy in reciprocal space
[tex]E_{p}(\vec{r}) = \sum_{\vec{g} }E_{g}\cdot e^{i\vec{g}\vec{r}}[/tex]

free electron wave function
[tex]\phi_{k}(\vec{r})=e^{i\vec{k}\vec{r}[/tex]

free electron wave function in first order approximation
[tex]\Psi_{k}(\vec{r})=\phi_{k}(\vec{r})+\sum_{\vec{k}^{'}\neq\vec{k}}\frac{\int\phi^{*}_{k'}(\vec{r})\cdot E_{p}(\vec{r})\cdot\phi_{k}(\vec{r})\cdot d^{3}r}{E(k)-E(k')}\cdot\phi_{k'}(\vec{r})[/tex]

The Attempt at a Solution



[tex]\int\phi^{*}_{k'}(\vec{r})\cdot E_{p}(\vec{r})\cdot\phi_{k}(\vec{r})\cdot d^{3}r=\sum_{\vec{g} }E_{g}\int e^{i(-\vec{k'}+\vec{g}+\vec{k})\cdot\vec{r}}d^{3}r=\sum_{\vec{g}}E_{g}\cdot\delta_{\vec{k'},\vec{k}+\vec{g}}[/tex]

I don't understan the last part , transition from complex exponential to Kronecker delta.
I have two options:
1.) When vectors satisfy k'=k+g then I have integral of [tex]\int d^{3}r[/tex] which must be 1, I am not clear about this.
2.) when vectors k' and k+g are not equal I have integral of [tex]\int [Cos(a) + i*Sin(a)] d^{3}r[/tex]
(a is some real number from the dot product in exponent) ,
this integral should be zero, but I don't see how ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your wavefunction isn't properly normalized. It should be

[tex]\phi_k(\mathbf{r}) = \frac{1}{\sqrt{V}}e^{i\bm k \cdot \bm r}[/tex]

So, what results is the integral

[tex]\frac{1}{V}\int d\mathbf{r} e^{i(-\mathbf{k}' + \mathbf{g} + \mathbf{k})\cdot \mathbf{r}}[/tex]

If [itex]\mathbf{k}' = \mathbf{k} + \mathbf{g}[/itex], then you just have an integral over the volume of your crystal, so you get V/V = 1.

If [itex]\mathbf{k}' \neq \mathbf{k} + \mathbf{g}[/itex], then the integral evaluates to

[tex]\left.\frac{1}{V}\frac{e^{iq_x x}}{iq_x}\frac{e^{iq_y y}}{iq_y}\frac{e^{iq_z z}}{iq_z}\right|_{\mathcal{V}}[/tex]

where it is integrated over the volume [itex]\mathcal{V}[/itex] and [itex]\mathbf{q} = -\mathbf{k}' + \mathbf{k} + \mathbf{g}[/itex]. Now, the wavevectors k', g and k must take values such that the wavefunction vanishes at the boundary. Since the result is proportional to your wavefunction, it vanishes at the boundary, and the result is zero.

Hence, if k' = k + g, the integral gives 1; if k' =/= k + g, the integral is zero. We write the result compactly using the kronecker delta [itex]\delta_{k',k+g}[/itex]
 
Last edited:
Thanks for help.
The case k'=k+g is clear to me now, but I'm still having difficulties with k' =/= k + g.

Since the result is proportional to your wavefunction, it vanishes at the boundary, and the result is zero.
I can't make [tex]\left.\frac{1}{V}\frac{e^{iq_x x}}{iq_x}\frac{e^{iq_y y}}{iq_y}\frac{e^{iq_z z}}{iq_z}[/tex] proportional to [tex]\phi_k(\mathbf{r}) = \frac{1}{\sqrt{V}}e^{i\bm k \cdot \bm r}[/tex]
If q=k then it is proportional, but q=-k'+k+g
 
natugnaro said:
Thanks for help.
The case k'=k+g is clear to me now, but I'm still having difficulties with k' =/= k + g.


I can't make [tex]\left.\frac{1}{V}\frac{e^{iq_x x}}{iq_x}\frac{e^{iq_y y}}{iq_y}\frac{e^{iq_z z}}{iq_z}[/tex] proportional to [tex]\phi_k(\mathbf{r}) = \frac{1}{\sqrt{V}}e^{i\bm k \cdot \bm r}[/tex]
If q=k then it is proportional, but q=-k'+k+g

[tex]e^{iq_x x} e^{iq_y y} e^{iq_z z} = e^{i q \cdot r} \propto \phi_q(\mathbf{r})[/tex]

k, k' and g all satisfy the boundary conditions of the problem such that the wavefunction vanishes at the boundary. Since q is just a sum of these [itex]\phi_q[/itex] will also vanish at the boundary.
 
I understand transition to Kronecker delta now.
But I run into more difficulties trying to solve this problem.
I'll put it aside for now.
regards Mute.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
27
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K