Solution for two unknowns with two equations

  • Thread starter Thread starter zoom1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Unknowns
zoom1
Messages
63
Reaction score
0
lb*cos(qb) - lc*cos(qc) = ld*cos(qd) - la*cos(qa)

lb*sin(qb) - lc*sin(qc) = ld*sin(qd) - la*sin(qa)


Those are the equations I have. I know all the parameters but qb and qc.

How can I solve for qb and qc ?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
zoom1 said:
lb*cos(qb) - lc*cos(qc) = ld*cos(qd) - la*cos(qa)

lb*sin(qb) - lc*sin(qc) = ld*sin(qd) - la*sin(qa)


Those are the equations I have. I know all the parameters but qb and qc.

How can I solve for qb and qc ?
This would mean the system is:

B⋅cos x - C⋅cos y = D
B⋅sin x - C⋅sin y = E

?
 
There is always the approach ##\sin(x) = \sqrt{1-\cos^2(x)}##, but there might be a better solution for this particular set of equations.
 
zoki85 said:
This would mean the system is:

B⋅cos x - C⋅cos y = D
B⋅sin x - C⋅sin y = E

?

Yes
 
Transform it into system of algebraic equation with tangent half-angle substitution:
tan(x/2)=u ⇒ sin(x)=2u/(1+u2) , cos(x)=(1-u2)/(1+u2)
tan(y/2)=v ⇒ sin(y)=2v/(1+v2) , cos(y)=(1-v2)/(1+v2).

Unfortunatelly, it seems in general case the system can't be solved exactly,and you'll have to do it with aproximative numerical methods (iterativelly).

*Post edited for removing typos
 
Last edited:
It is possible to find an analytic solution. The common prefactors on the left side make it much easier.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.

Similar threads

Back
Top