Solution of a Transport-type equation

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Set Abominae
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around finding all solutions to a transport-type equation given by the partial differential equation \(\frac{\partial u}{\partial t}(x,t)-\frac{\partial u}{\partial x}(x,t)=-2u(x,t)\). Participants explore various methods for solving this equation, including coordinate transformations and the method of characteristics, while discussing the implications of initial conditions and the uniqueness of solutions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One solution proposed is \(u(x,t)=Ae^{x-t}\), and solutions of the form \(u(x,t)=f(x+t)\) are noted for the homogeneous case.
  • Some participants suggest using a change of coordinates, such as \(\xi = x+t\), to simplify the equation and look for traveling wave solutions.
  • Another participant attempts a different coordinate transformation, \(x^{'}=t-x\) and \(t^{'}=t+x\), leading to a modified equation that suggests solutions of the form \(u(x,t)=Ae^{f(t^{'})-x^{'}}\).
  • There is a discussion about the uniqueness of solutions for first-order linear equations, emphasizing that without initial conditions, a family of solutions exists.
  • Some participants express uncertainty about how to combine solutions or whether their proposed forms satisfy the original equation.
  • A later reply suggests that the family of solutions can be expressed as \(u(x,t)=f(x+t)+g(x-t)\), but there is confusion about the validity of this form.
  • One participant acknowledges a mistake regarding the inhomogeneous nature of the equation and proposes using the method of characteristics to derive a solution involving initial conditions.
  • The final proposed solution is \(u(x,t) = f\left(\frac{x+t}{2}\right)e^{x-t}\), derived from the method of characteristics, but it requires inverting the transformation to express it in terms of \(x\) and \(t\).

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express multiple competing views on the nature of the solutions and the methods to derive them. There is no consensus on a single solution or approach, and some participants remain uncertain about the correctness of their contributions.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the lack of initial conditions, which affects the uniqueness of solutions, and the potential for misinterpretation of the equation's inhomogeneous nature. The discussion also reflects varying levels of understanding among participants regarding the methods used.

Set Abominae
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
Hi there,
I'm trying to find all solutions of:

[tex]\frac{\partial u}{\partial t}(x,t)-\frac{\partial u}{\partial x}(x,t)=-2u(x,t)[/tex]

I know that one solution is [tex]u(x,t)=Ae^{x-t}[/tex], and any solution of [tex]\frac{\partial u}{\partial t}(x,t)-\frac{\partial u}{\partial x}(x,t)=0[/tex] is of the form [tex]u(x,t)=f(x+t)[/tex].

I tried adding these solutions together but it doesn't work...

The question says that a change of coordinates to simplify [tex]\frac{\partial u}{\partial t}(x,t)-\frac{\partial u}{\partial x}(x,t)[/tex] could be useful, but I don't know where to begin in doing that...

Any help would be much appreciated, thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Take [itex]\xi = x+t[/itex] and [itex]u(x,t)=f(x+t)=f(\xi)[/itex]. What you are looking for is traveling wave solutions.
 
I tried a coordinate change of [tex]x^{'}=t-x , t^{'}=t+x[/tex] and tried looking for solutions of the form [tex]u(x,t)=v(x^{'},t^{'})[/tex]. This reduces the problem to [tex]\frac{\partial u}{\partial t}(x,t) - \frac{\partial u}{\partial x}(x,t) = 2\frac{\partial v}{\partial x^{'}}(x^{'},t^{'})[/tex].

Now I think I have to solve [tex]\frac{\partial v}{\partial x^{'}}(x^{'},t^'})+v(x^{'},t^{'}) = 0[/tex], all solutions of which are of the form [tex]v(x^{'},t^{'})=Ae^{f(t^{'})-x^{'}}[/tex] (I think), so our solution set are functions [tex]u[/tex] of the form [tex]u(x,t)=Ae^{f(x+t)+x-t}[/tex] for some function [tex]f[/tex].

I know that these functions solve the equation, and I don't know how to find any other kind of solutions...
 
You are missing the point. First of all, your ecuation is a first order linear equation, which means that given an initial condition (well behaved and non-characteristic of course), your solution is unique. This tells you that, since you don't have initial condition, you'll find a family of solutions.
Now, let's backtrack to the first suggestion. If [itex]\xi = x+t[/itex] and [itex]u(x,t) = f(x+t) = f(\xi)[/itex], then

[tex]u_t-u_x = 0,[/tex]

so [itex]f(x+t)[/itex] is a solution of the homogeneous equation. Now, for the particular solution, let [itex]\eta = x-t[/itex] and [itex]u(x,t) = g(x-t) = g(\eta)[/itex], then

[tex]u_t-u_x+2u= -2g'(\eta)+2g(\eta) = 0.[/tex]

Now, what is the family of solutions for your PDE?
 
So I would guess that they are of the form [tex]u(x,t)=f(x+t)+g(x-t)[/tex], where if [tex]\eta=x-t[/tex], then [tex]g'(\eta)=g(\eta)[/tex], much like ODE's when you add the solutions...

But I've tried plugging that back in and I'm not sure it works... Sorry if I'm missing the point, I've only just started studying these...

:frown:
 
Yup, that's correct,, but there is a more explicit form of the solution, given the ordinary differential equation for the particular solution, this means that

[tex]u(x,t) = f(x+t) + Ae^{x-t}[/tex]

is the family of solutions you are looking for (and given an initial condition, you can easily determine A and f).
 
Last edited:
But then doesn't [tex]u_{t}-u_{x}+2u = 2f[/tex]?

:confused:
 
True, my mistake. There is no inhomogeneous equation. The whole thing is wrong. Let's start over. We are going to use the method of characteristics. Given the equation [itex]u_t-u_x-2u=0[/itex], we can write it as

[tex]\left(\begin{array}{c} 1 \\ -1 \\ 2u\end{array}\right) \cdot \left( \begin{array}{c} u_x \\ u_t \\ -1 \end{array}\right)=0.[/tex]

This equation geometrically states that the vector field (1,-1,2u) is tangent to the surface [itex]\bigl(x(\xi,\eta),t(\xi,\eta),u(\xi,\eta)\bigr)[/itex], so given an initial condition [itex]u(\xi,0) = f(\xi)[/itex], we want to continue the surface trough the parameter [itex]\eta[/itex] using the ortogonality condition. So

[tex]\frac{d x}{d \eta} = 1,[/tex]

[tex]\frac{d t}{d \eta} = -1,[/tex]

[tex]\frac{d u}{d \eta} = 2 u,[/tex]

where [itex]x(\xi,0) = \xi,\, t(\xi,0) = \xi,\,u(\xi,0) = f(\xi)[/itex]. Hence

[tex]x(\xi,\eta) = \eta+\xi,[/tex]

[tex]t(\xi,\eta) = -\eta+\xi,[/tex]

[tex]u(\xi,\eta) = f(\xi)e^{2\eta}.[/tex]

Now you have a surface that satisfies the initial condition plus the PDE, but you need a function, which means invertin the transformation [itex](\xi,\eta) \rightarrow (x,t)[/itex], so

[tex]\xi = \frac{x+t}{2},[/tex]

[tex]\eta = \frac{x-t}{2},[/tex]

and

[tex]u(x,t) = f\left(\frac{x+t}{2}\right)e^{x-t}[/tex]

is the solution of the equation.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K