Solution satisfying initial conditions for a pde of second order

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The general solution for the second-order partial differential equation (PDE) is given by U(x,t) = f(3x + t) + g(-x + t), where f and g are arbitrary functions. The initial conditions provided are U(x,0) = sin(x) and Du/dt(x,0) = cos(2x). By differentiating the initial conditions and manipulating the equations, it is established that 4f'(3x) = 2cos(x), leading to the solution f(u) = 1/2sin(u/3) after integration. This solution must be verified by substituting back into the original PDE.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of second-order partial differential equations (PDEs)
  • Familiarity with differentiation and integration techniques
  • Knowledge of arbitrary functions in mathematical analysis
  • Experience with initial value problems in PDEs
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the method of characteristics for solving PDEs
  • Learn about Fourier series and their application in PDEs
  • Investigate the role of boundary conditions in PDE solutions
  • Explore numerical methods for solving second-order PDEs
USEFUL FOR

Mathematics students, researchers in applied mathematics, and professionals working with differential equations will benefit from this discussion.

maggie56
Messages
26
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I have found the general solution to a second order pde to be
U(x,t) = f(3x + t) + g(-x + t) where f and g are arbitrary functions

I have initial conditions
U(x,0) = sin(x)
Du/dt (x,0) = cos (2x)


The Attempt at a Solution



I have found that
U(x,0) = f(3x) + g(-x) = sin(x)
Du/dt(x,0) = f'(3x) + g'(-x) = cos(2x)

From this point I am not sure what to do. I have tried differentiating u(x,0) with respect to x which i think gives me
Du/dx (x,0) = 3f'(3x) - g'(-x) = cos (x)
I thought i would then equate the equations but I am not actually sure ths helps.

Could someone please point me in the right direction for this question

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Ok, didn't get it that other time huh? Then I'll work one through and you do the other one ok.

f(3x)+g(-x)=\sin(x)
f'(3x)+g'(-x)=\cos(x)

I differentiate the top one with respect to x:

3f'(3x)-g'(-x)=\cos(x)
f'(3x)+g'(-x)=\cos(x)

Now add them:

4f'(3x)=2\cos(x)

To get rid of that 3x in there, let u=3x or x=1/3u then:

\frac{df}{du}=\frac{df}{dx}\frac{dx}{du}=1/3\frac{df}{dx}

Then substitute that into that DE with 3x in there:

12 \frac{df}{du}=2\cos(1/3u)

integrate it:

f(u)=1/2\sin(u/3)

so that:

f(3x+t)=1/2 \sin((3x+t)/3)

I believe that's right anyway. Would need to back-substitute it into the PDE to check it.

Ok, now you do the other one.
 
Last edited:
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K