Solution to Density Matrix Pure State Problem

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around determining the conditions under which a given density operator, represented by a matrix, qualifies as a pure state density operator. The matrix is defined with parameters \(a_1\) and \(a_2\), and the properties of pure states are referenced, particularly the trace conditions.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the implications of the trace conditions for the density operator, particularly focusing on the calculations involving the square of the operator and its trace. Questions arise regarding the normalization of the density operator and the implications of the parameters \(a_1\) and \(a_2\) on its purity.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants questioning the initial assumptions about the density operator's form and its normalization. Some guidance has been provided regarding the need for the trace to equal one, and there is acknowledgment of the need to adjust the density operator to meet this requirement.

Contextual Notes

There is a noted constraint regarding the normalization of the density operator, which has not been addressed in the initial formulation. Participants are examining the implications of this normalization on the parameters involved.

LagrangeEuler
Messages
711
Reaction score
22

Homework Statement


Find condition for which ##\hat{\rho}## will be pure state density operator?
##\hat{\rho} = \begin{bmatrix}
1+a_1 & a_2 \\[0.3em]
a_2^* & 1-a_1
\end{bmatrix}##


Homework Equations


In case of pure state ##Tr(\hat{\rho}^2)=Tr(\hat{\rho})=1##.



The Attempt at a Solution


Using that condition I got
##\hat{\rho}^2 = \begin{bmatrix}
(1+a_1)^2+|a_2|^2 & (1+a_1)a_2+a_2(1-a_1) \\[0.3em]
(1+a_1)a_2^*+a_2^*(1-a_1) & (1-a_1)^2+|a_2|^2
\end{bmatrix}##
and from that
## 2|a|^2+2a_1^2=-1## which can not be true. Because ##a_1## must be real, condition to ##\hat{\rho}## is hermitian.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't quite understand. That density operator you stated, it's not a pure state density operator, and that's why The trace of the square of rho will not be 1. It's correct. I afraid I did not understand your question.
 
Question is find condition put on ##a_1## and ##a_2## for which ##\hat{\rho}## is pure state density operator.
 
The problem occurs because you have not normalized the original density operator yet.
 
Tnx a lot Fightfish. I did not see that trace of given matrix is not ##1##. Density matrix must be
##\hat{\rho} =\frac{1}{2} \begin{bmatrix}
1+a_1 & a_2 \\[0.3em]
a_2^* & 1-a_1
\end{bmatrix}##
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
6K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
6K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K