Solution to Density Matrix Pure State Problem

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
4 replies · 2K views
LagrangeEuler
Messages
711
Reaction score
22

Homework Statement


Find condition for which ##\hat{\rho}## will be pure state density operator?
##\hat{\rho} = \begin{bmatrix}
1+a_1 & a_2 \\[0.3em]
a_2^* & 1-a_1
\end{bmatrix}##


Homework Equations


In case of pure state ##Tr(\hat{\rho}^2)=Tr(\hat{\rho})=1##.



The Attempt at a Solution


Using that condition I got
##\hat{\rho}^2 = \begin{bmatrix}
(1+a_1)^2+|a_2|^2 & (1+a_1)a_2+a_2(1-a_1) \\[0.3em]
(1+a_1)a_2^*+a_2^*(1-a_1) & (1-a_1)^2+|a_2|^2
\end{bmatrix}##
and from that
## 2|a|^2+2a_1^2=-1## which can not be true. Because ##a_1## must be real, condition to ##\hat{\rho}## is hermitian.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't quite understand. That density operator you stated, it's not a pure state density operator, and that's why The trace of the square of rho will not be 1. It's correct. I afraid I did not understand your question.
 
Question is find condition put on ##a_1## and ##a_2## for which ##\hat{\rho}## is pure state density operator.
 
The problem occurs because you have not normalized the original density operator yet.
 
Tnx a lot Fightfish. I did not see that trace of given matrix is not ##1##. Density matrix must be
##\hat{\rho} =\frac{1}{2} \begin{bmatrix}
1+a_1 & a_2 \\[0.3em]
a_2^* & 1-a_1
\end{bmatrix}##