MHB Solution To Equation Involving Square Root: Extraneous Solution?

AI Thread Summary
The equation sqrt{x+2}= x-4 has a solution set of only x=7, as x=2 is an extraneous solution. When substituting x=7, both sides of the equation equal 3, confirming it as a valid solution. In contrast, substituting x=2 results in a mismatch, as the left side equals 2 while the right side equals -2. The discussion emphasizes that the square root function only yields non-negative results, which is crucial in solving such equations. Therefore, the correct solution is x=7.
rebo1984
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
Hi everyone,

What is the solution set of the equation: sqrt{x+2}= x-4

I got 2 and 7.

Is it correct or is it just 7. If so why?

Thanks:)
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Re: Solution to equations

It's just seven. You're squaring the RHS which introduces an extraneous solution.
 
Re: Solution to equations

rebo1984 said:
Hi everyone,

What is the solution set of the equation: sqrt{x+2}= x-4

I got 2 and 7.

Is it correct or is it just 7. If so why?

Thanks:)
Check:
if x= 7 then sqrt(x+ 2)= sqrt(7+ 2)= sqrt(9)= 3 while x- 4= 7- 4= 3. Those are the same so x= 7 satisfies sqrt(x+ 2)= x- 4.

If x= 2, sqrt(x+ 2)= sqrt(2+ 2)= sqrt(4)= 2 while x- 4= 2- 4= -2. Those are not the same so x= 2 does not satisfy sqrt(x+ 2)= x- 4.

Note that the square root function, sqrt(4), cannot give both "2" and "-2" because a function, by definition, must give a single value. Further, suppose you were asked to solve the equation x^2= a. There are two numbers that satisfy that equation which you would write as x= +/- sqrt(a). The reason you need the "+/-" is because sqrt(a) is only the positive solution.
 
Re: Solution to equations

Thank you for your very detailed response.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Back
Top