Solutions to Hungerford's "Abstract Algebra" 3rd Ed.

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the challenges of learning abstract algebra using Hungerford's textbook without access to a solutions manual. The original poster expresses frustration at not being able to verify their understanding of the material and the correctness of their work, especially while juggling multiple demanding courses. They recognize the importance of the learning process over merely obtaining solutions, cautioning against reliance on solution manuals, as this could hinder deeper understanding. Suggestions include using solutions sparingly for initial guidance and emphasizing the need to attempt problems independently before checking answers. The conversation highlights the balance between self-study and seeking help, advocating for a thoughtful approach to using resources while mastering complex concepts.
Physics2341313
Messages
53
Reaction score
0
I'm taking an abstract algebra course that uses Hungerford's "An Introduction to Abstract Algebra" 3rd Ed. And while I feel like I'm following the material sufficiently and can do most of the proofs it's hard to learn and practice the material without a solutions guide. How am I supposed to know the work I've practiced outside of class is correct, or if I have misunderstood a fundamental concept without a way to check my work?

I understand that as I approach subjects that are intrinsically more difficult it will require more time to understand the concepts. I'm taking abstract and real analysis simultaneously, on top of physics and cs courses, so staring at a page for hours on end isn't really a viable solution. Whereas simply looking at the solution to the problem could show me the error in my understanding in a matter of minutes.

That being said... is there a solutions manual / solutions anywhere? I've been scraping the web and have come up empty handed. I can't even find an instructor's solutions manual.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Using a solution manual is cheating your way to a solution. It will get you a very nice and well-crafted solution. But it won't teach you at all about the process it takes you to get that solution. It is that process that is most important, not the eventual solutions to the problems.
Trust me, if you're going to keep relying on solution manuals, it will hit you in the face eventually.. hard.

Staring at a page for hours is a very decent strategy. I stare at pages for several hours too before it clicks. If you can't afford the time it takes you to get a "click", then you shouldn't be taking abstract algebra.
 
Still, I think there is something to be said for looking at just the first few solutions , reverse engineering them, to get a feel for how things are done. As long as you use this just as intro help and not your usual approach, I thinking it could be helpful.
 
WWGD said:
Still, I think there is something to be said for looking at just the first few solutions , reverse engineering them, to get a feel for how things are done. As long as you use this just as intro help and not your usual approach, I thinking it could be helpful.
Just for using solution manuals or answer keys in general,
Do as much as you can on each exercise and only check the solution in the manual AFTER you have done your best work.
 
symbolipoint said:
Just for using solution manuals or answer keys in general,
Do as much as you can on each exercise and only check the solution in the manual AFTER you have done your best work.

I agree, I think the pure bottom-up approach is over-emphasized.
 
Bit Britain-specific but I was wondering, what's the best path to take for A-Levels out of the following (I know Y10 seems a bit early to be thinking about A-levels, but my choice will impact what I do this year/ in y11) I (almost) definitely want to do physics at University - so keep that in mind... The subjects that I'm almost definitely going to take are Maths, Further Maths and Physics, and I'm taking a fast track programme which means that I'll be taking AS computer science at the end...
After a year of thought, I decided to adjust my ratio for applying the US/EU(+UK) schools. I mostly focused on the US schools before, but things are getting complex and I found out that Europe is also a good place to study. I found some institutes that have professors with similar interests. But gaining the information is much harder than US schools (like you have to contact professors in advance etc). For your information, I have B.S. in engineering (low GPA: 3.2/4.0) in Asia - one SCI...
I'm going to make this one quick since I have little time. Background: Throughout my life I have always done good in Math. I almost always received 90%+, and received easily upwards of 95% when I took normal-level HS Math courses. When I took Grade 9 "De-Streamed" Math (All students must take "De-Streamed" in Canada), I initially had 98% until I got very sick and my mark had dropped to 95%. The Physics teachers and Math teachers talked about me as if I were some sort of genius. Then, an...

Similar threads

Back
Top