Solve a radial acceleration problem?

Click For Summary
To solve a radial acceleration problem, the minimum known variable required is the speed of the object, as demonstrated in a scenario where a car traverses a bump. The discussion revolves around determining the smallest radius of a bump that allows the car to maintain contact with the road, emphasizing the relationship between speed and centripetal force. Participants explore the concept of forces acting on the car, noting that at the critical point before losing contact, the normal force becomes zero, leaving only the weight of the car to provide the necessary centripetal force. Clarifications are made regarding the interpretation of radius, with the smallest radius being a point of contention, as it could imply a nonexistent bump. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for accurately solving such problems in physics.
Alem2000
Messages
117
Reaction score
0
I wanted to konw what is the least amount of knowns you need to solve a radial acceleration problem? My friend told me he was given a problem where a care was traveling over a bump and the only known he had was the speed of the care, no radious, no nothing. And the question was to solve for radius...that seems hard is it possilbe to get a numerical value?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
One version of such a question goes like this: Given a speed v, what is the smallest radius bump (that is, the sharpest bump) that the car could traverse without losing contact with the road?

Give it a try.
 
okay, given a speedv what is the r_m where the sub m is min
hmm well F=m(v^2/r_m)... i don't know! I don't understandt how can you solve with one given? you have the radial acceleration which would be pointing inward, and you have your speedv pointing tangent to the path. Could you relate the sum of forces in the y direction and the x direction to cancel out terms? :frown:
 
Doc Al,

Maybe I'm misunderstanding, but wouldn't it be the largest radius bump? If it is the smallest radius bump, I could say the radius is zero and there would be no bump? Or am I lost?

Moooooo
 
I was going to say v^2/r=4\pi r/t^2 but i don't have time either do i?
 
Alem2000 said:
okay, given a speedv what is the r_m where the sub m is min
hmm well F=m(v^2/r_m)... i don't know!
So far, so good. Now what force is providing the "centripetal" force? (What forces act on the car?)
 
Moose352 said:
Maybe I'm misunderstanding, but wouldn't it be the largest radius bump? If it is the smallest radius bump, I could say the radius is zero and there would be no bump? Or am I lost?
Well, I know what you mean... if the radius were 1 cm, it would just be like rolling over a pebble. :smile:

But that's not the way to think of this. What's the radius of curvature of a flat road? Not zero! Think of a spherical balloon being inflated. As it inflates, r increases but the surface becomes flatter. A perfectly flat road would have infinite radius.
 
what force? the normal force? Yeah i guess, with friction would keep it in a curcular path... :shy:
 
Friction, eh? :rolleyes:

The forces acting vertically are the weight (down) and the normal force (up). At the limit before the car loses contact, the normal force goes to zero. So the only force acting on the car, and keeping it in contact with the bump, is its weight.
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
66
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
12K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
890
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
25K
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K