Solve Acceleration of Hinges Problem on Brilliant.org

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Abhijeet Verma
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Acceleration Hinges
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on solving the "Acceleration of Hinges" problem from Brilliant.org, which involves a square frame of four uniform rods connected by frictionless hinges. The problem requires determining the relationship between the accelerations of two vertices, P and Q, under a horizontal force applied at vertex P. Solutions discussed include using the work-energy theorem and the center of mass frame approach, leading to differential equations of motion and Lagrange equations. The results yield simple expressions for the accelerations in terms of each other.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic mechanics, specifically Newton's laws of motion.
  • Familiarity with the work-energy theorem in physics.
  • Knowledge of Lagrangian mechanics and differential equations.
  • Concept of center of mass and its application in dynamics.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the work-energy theorem in detail, focusing on its application to systems with multiple bodies.
  • Learn about Lagrangian mechanics, including the derivation of Lagrange equations.
  • Explore the concept of the center of mass frame and its implications in non-inertial reference frames.
  • Investigate the dynamics of rigid body motion, particularly in systems with constraints like hinges.
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, particularly those studying mechanics, educators looking for problem-solving methodologies, and anyone interested in advanced dynamics involving rigid bodies and hinge systems.

Abhijeet Verma
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
This is a problem posted by a member on Brilliant.org (https://brilliant.org/problems/acceleration-of-hinges/). I found one way to solve the problem, but it is really long, and i am looking for some different solutions. The problem is-

e172ee5a667b68a172bf57e4c88e60af6462f29d.png
Four similar rods of uniform density are connected with frictionless hinges. This frame is placed on a horizontal smooth tabletop, such that its shape is a square. Vertex P is acted upon by a horizontal force in the direction of the diagonal, and due to this force it begins to move at an acceleration of ##a_P##.

If the initial acceleration of the opposite vertex Q is ##a_Q= k.a_P## then find k.

k is positive if Q moves away from P and k is negative if Q moves closer to P.

Please post any solution or approach that can be applied in it.
Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Abhijeet Verma said:
I found one way to solve the problem, but it is really long
Is at least the result you get from the long solution something simple? Then there is a chance for a simpler way to solve it.
 
A.T. said:
Is at least the result you get from the long solution something simple? Then there is a chance for a simpler way to solve it.
I solved it using the work-energy theorem, by finding the energy of the system after displacing by a small amount, and the work done by the force applied at point P, somewhat similar to what someone posted there. Finding the energy is pretty long, but yes the results are simple expressions in ##a_P## and ##a_Q##.
 
Abhijeet Verma said:
I solved it using the work-energy theorem, by finding the energy of the system after displacing by a small amount, and the work done by the force applied at point P, somewhat similar to what someone posted there. Finding the energy is pretty long, but yes the results are simple expressions in ##a_P## and ##a_Q##.

I would try to use the center of mass frame, where the kinematics is nicely symmetrical. The center of mass frame is non-inertial, but has a known acceleration, and thus a known inertial force field. Since the inertial force field is uniform, it doesn't create any torques at the bars, around their centers of mass.
 
First you must obtain differential equations of motion not at the single moment but for all ##t##. For ##t>0## the square will deform to a rhombus. So this is a system with two degrees of freedom

0c508385e751.png


Let ##X## be the axis of inertial frame and ##x## be the coordinate of the center of the rhombus. The generalized coordinates are ##\alpha,x##.

We shall assume that the force ##\boldsymbol F## does not depend on time. It does not matter since we will consider the differential equations at initial moment only. Then find the kinetic energy to this system ##T=T(\dot\alpha,\dot x,\alpha,x)## You will see that actually ##T## does not depend on ##x,\alpha##. And write the Lagrange equations
$$\frac{d}{dt}\frac{\partial T}{\partial \dot x}-\frac{\partial T}{\partial x}=Q_x,\quad \frac{d}{dt}\frac{\partial T}{\partial \dot \alpha}-\frac{\partial T}{\partial \alpha}=Q_\alpha.$$
The first equation will be ##4m\ddot x=F## (##m## is the mass of the rod), but the second one is not so evident, you have to calculate for it.
 
wrobel said:
First you must obtain differential equations of motion not at the single moment but for all ##t##. For ##t>0## the square will deform to a rhombus. So this is a system with two degrees of freedom

0c508385e751.png


Let ##X## be the axis of inertial frame and ##x## be the coordinate of the center of the rhombus. The generalized coordinates are ##\alpha,x##.

We shall assume that the force ##\boldsymbol F## does not depend on time. It does not matter since we will consider the differential equations at initial moment only. Then find the kinetic energy to this system ##T=T(\dot\alpha,\dot x,\alpha,x)## You will see that actually ##T## does not depend on ##x,\alpha##. And write the Lagrange equations
$$\frac{d}{dt}\frac{\partial T}{\partial \dot x}-\frac{\partial T}{\partial x}=Q_x,\quad \frac{d}{dt}\frac{\partial T}{\partial \dot \alpha}-\frac{\partial T}{\partial \alpha}=Q_\alpha.$$
The first equation will be ##4m\ddot x=F## (##m## is the mass of the rod), but the second one is not so evident, you have to calculate for it.

Sorry, but i don't know Lagrangian Mechanics and hence don't understand the solution.
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
53
Views
6K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
7K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
5K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K