Solve Difficult Equation: x = 4

  • Thread starter Thread starter mazen_zone
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The equation presented, x = 4, was initially solved graphically, with participants questioning the possibility of an algebraic solution. There was a consensus that solving such equations analytically is challenging, often requiring numerical methods or calculators. Suggestions included using logarithms and manipulating the equation, but these were deemed ineffective for this specific problem. The discussion highlighted that if a rational solution exists, it is likely integral, leading to quick checks with simple integers like 1 and 4. Ultimately, the conclusion is that without a straightforward method, the solution may be complex and transcendental.
mazen_zone
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
hey all,

a friend gave me this equation and required that i solve it:

http://www.geocities.com/mazen_zone/Untitled.jpg

I could only solve it graphically and the answer was (x = 4),
so i wonder if there is an algebraic solution for it ?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I don't think there is any way to solve it algebraically.

With such equations, it's easy to create them, while terribly annoying to solve without calculators to solve it numerically for you. I think your friend may have caused you a headache for laughs :wink:
 
Last edited:
Mentallic said:
I don't think there is any way to solve it algebraically.

With such equations, it's easy to create them, while terribly annoying to solve without calculators to solve it numerically for you. I think your friend may have caused you a headache for laughs :wink:

lol yeah i guess...thanks anyway.
 
log it, make sqrt(x) the subject, square both sides, and I think that would give you a quadratic which is easy to solve.

edit: Sorry I just realized that's a dumb idea. Yeah, I don't think there's any way to solve it analytically.
 
Anyway, not with log and all. Since you have a sum of the two, the log would not apply in that sense.

Cheers
 
Calculators use Newton's method to solve equations (including this type of equations of course)
maybe that's the only analytic way to solve it, but i don't know how to use this method :smile:
 
"Algebraically" is a vague term. It is easy to see that if there is a rational answer then it must actually be integral, and in fact x is a square. This leads you to try 1,4 and get the answer (almost) immediately.

If there isn't such a nice easy to spot idea, then the solution is almost certainly going to be nasty, transcendental and impossible to write down in any nice way, so don't bother to try.
 

Similar threads

MHB Solve $x^4+(4-x)^4=32$ Equation
Replies
2
Views
1K
B What went wrong with (-x)^2=x^2?
Replies
22
Views
2K
MHB Solve Equation: $x^4+2x^3-x^2-6x-3=0$
Replies
7
Views
2K
MHB How can I solve the problem of $e^x-\ln{x}=4$ without a calculator?
Replies
10
Views
1K
B Are Inverse Problems More Complex Than Direct Problems in Mathematics?
Replies
13
Views
3K
Difficult to understand the solution provided in the video (travelling salesman problem)
Replies
3
Views
2K
I How can I solve the equation x-esin(x)=4?
Replies
2
Views
1K
MHB Express cos(2 tan^-1(x/4)) and sin(2tan^-1(x/4) as an algebraic expression in x
Replies
3
Views
2K
How can I rederive this Mathematica result for a complex equation?
Replies
2
Views
2K
I Solving a System of Nonlinear Equations Symbolically
Replies
9
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top