Solve Earth-Moon Mass Estimation Problem - Help Needed!

  • Thread starter Thread starter calculator20
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mass Moon
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around estimating the mass of the Moon using gravitational principles, given specific distances and the mass of the Earth. The participant struggles with the textbook problem, particularly with the significance of the distance where the gravitational field is zero. It is clarified that the net force being zero allows for equating gravitational forces, leading to a mathematical expression involving the masses and distances. A potential typo in the textbook is identified, suggesting that the distance for the gravitational equilibrium point is incorrect, which affects the calculations. Adjusting this distance resolves the issue, enabling the correct estimation of the Moon's mass.
calculator20
Messages
47
Reaction score
0
I'm looking at a textbook problem which has an answer but no working out. I've read the chapter several times and looked at the equations but can't see where to start with it? Can you help?

Assuming the Earth and Moon to be isolated from all other masses, use the following data to estimate the mass of the Moon.

Mass of the Earth = 6.0 x 10^24 kg

Distance between centre of Earth and centre of Moon = 3.8 x 10^8 m

Distance from centre of Earth at which gravitational field is zero = 2.8 x 10^8 m

Answer = 7.4 x 10^22 kg

I think it's the 2 distances throwing me, Why do I need to know when gravity is zero? Do I need to find force? Help! Many thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, force is the key here. No need to calculate: that's already been done for this peculiar intermediate point. The net force is zero. Earth and moon pull equally hard on any test mass at this point. What you want is a relevant expression (oh, this nice template we all should use!) for these forces in terms like the mass of the earth, the moon, some distances, perhaps a constant, and so on. Then sort out what you know and don't know c.q. want to know. Then it becomes mathematics.
 
Thanks for that, still not quite getting though.

If net force is zero do I equate the 2 versions of GM/r^2? G's cancel giving:

Me/R^2 = Mm/(R-r)^2

6x10^24/(2.8x10^8)^2 x (1x10^8)^2= 7.7x10^23

Close but not right, where am I going wrong?
 
Subtle difference. Too big to ignore as you conclude correctly. What else could be involved ?
 
I'm sure I'm staring at it but I have no idea!
 
'Kidding'... 7.4 x 10^22 kg and 7.7x10^22 are close. 7.7x10^23 is an order of magnitude too big.
Not subtle at all (for subtle I thought about rotation effects, but forget about that).

Could there be a typo somewhere in the exercise?
As you found mass ratio = distance^-2 ratio. Ratio should be around 80, so distance ratio around 9. Here it is around 3 causing trouble. I'm puzzled.
 
Maybe it is a printing typo. I've double checked the original and I've used the right numbers.

If my method and answer should be the correct ones that's fine. If I am missing something please let me know.

Thanks again for your help!
 
back to the rotation issue. Google L1 point Earth moon L1 to realize that its effect is bigger than I thought...
 
calculator20 said:
Distance from centre of Earth at which gravitational field is zero = 2.8 x 10^8 m
That's a typo in your textbook. It looks like the authors lost a factor of ten somewhere along the way in creating this problem. That's the location at which the gravitational forces would cancel if the Moon was ten times as massive as it is. If you use a distance of 3.42 x 10^8 m instead of that erroneous value you will get the correct mass.
 
Last edited:
  • #10
Thank you both, much appreciated!
 
Back
Top