Solve for Acceleration at Point B in a Rod on a Frictionless Surface"

  • Thread starter Thread starter saltine
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Physics
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around determining the acceleration at point B of a rod resting on a frictionless surface when a force is applied. The problem involves concepts of rotational dynamics and linear acceleration, particularly focusing on the relationship between the applied force and the resulting motion of the rod.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the relationship between the applied force and the resulting acceleration at point B, questioning whether the acceleration can be derived simply from F = ma or if rotational dynamics must be considered. There are discussions about the implications of applying force at different points on the rod and how that affects the motion of point B.

Discussion Status

The conversation is active, with participants sharing their thoughts and interpretations. Some have referenced external resources, such as a lecture, to draw parallels to the problem at hand. There is an ongoing exploration of how the acceleration at point B can be understood through both linear and rotational perspectives, but no consensus has been reached yet.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the force is not applied at the center of mass, which raises questions about the resulting motion of the rod and point B. There is also mention of a potential contradiction in expected motion based on different interpretations of the problem setup.

saltine
Messages
84
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Force F is applied to a rod resting on a frictionless surface. What is the acceleration at B?
3075595773_7ce3332ac1.jpg


Homework Equations


The length of the rod is L. Its mass is m.
Icenter = mL2/12

The Attempt at a Solution


The rod is supposed to spin about its center of mass. The acceleration at B is the same as that at A in polar coordinate center at the center of mass.

τ = (L/2) F = Icenter α => α = 6F/mL
a = (L/2) α = 3F/m eθ

where <b>eθ</b> is a unit vector in the counter-clockwise tangent direction relative to the center of rotation.

Is this correct? Where did the centripetal force go?

There is no centripetal force because there is no actual rotation at the moment (ω=0 rad/s).

- Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Since there is no friction, the "a" should be F/m shouldn't it?
 


shouldn't it be just Fnet=ma?
 


That is my question: Should it??

Do these situations give the same movement at B?
3075677529_3697cd62da.jpg


When I tried it using a pen on a table, it is obvious that point B moves up in the top diagram and it moves down in the bottom diagram. The F is not applied to the center of mass in the original question. Does that make the difference?

If it was just F = ma, wouldn't it imply that point B would be moving downward? Which contradicts the reality?
 


I know that the center mass will move in a line. There's was a MIT physics physics lecture on something very close to this. Can't seem to find where..
 


YAY! found it http://ocw.mit.edu/OcwWeb/Physics/8-01Physics-IFall1999/VideoLectures/detail/embed21.htm

Can you explain if you get it?

Starts at 07:37
 
Last edited by a moderator:


About the lecture:

I understand it but I don't that the problem is the lecture is similar to this one. In the example in the video at 7:38 where there is a spinning rod, the rod is spinning about point P, but the center of mass of the rod is at point C. The professor was saying that spinning the rod like this generates a force along the rod, because the centripetal forces do not balance out.

The part that is almost the same as my problem comes at 15:22, it shows that the center of mass would move parallel to force F, and the rod will spin at the same time.

The rod it self would have an acceleration of acm = F/m (moving downward). The point B of the rod would have an additional component from the rotation 3F/m which moves up. So if I add the two together, point B would have the acceleration:

aB = 3F/m - F/m = 2F/m this says that the point B would move up momentarily.

If there was an object just above point B, when the force F is applied, point B will push against that object.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
55
Views
6K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K