MHB Solve for k in System of Equations

AI Thread Summary
To solve for k in the given system of equations, the determinant of the matrix must be analyzed. A unique solution exists if the determinant is nonzero, while a determinant of zero indicates either no solutions or infinitely many solutions. The discussion suggests two approaches: determining k for an invertible matrix or finding k that results in infinitely many solutions. Participants emphasize the importance of understanding the role of the determinant in these scenarios. Ultimately, the solution hinges on the value of k that satisfies these conditions.
wonguyen1995
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
Find k to have a solution?
x-3y=6
x+3z=-3
2x+kx+(3-k)z=1LATEX
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
wonguyen1995 said:
Find k to have a solution?
x-3y=6
x+3z=-3
2x+kx+(3-k)z=1LATEX

Have you thought about what role the determinant would play?
 
dwsmith said:
Have you thought about what role the determinant would play?

of course I think it should better if i have sample of solution. i will research carefully on this.
 
wonguyen1995 said:
of course I think it should better if i have sample of solution. i will research carefully on this.

We know the matrix
\[
\begin{bmatrix}
1&-3&0\\
1&0&3\\
2&k&3-k
\end{bmatrix}
\]
has unique solution if the determinant is what?
Second, if the determinant is zero, we have no solutions or infinitely many solutions.

We have two approaches. One assume the determinant is nonzero and find k that makes it invertible or assume the determinant is zero and try to find a k such that we have infinitely many solutions.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Back
Top