MHB Solve for x: e^-0.38x=.3 - I Got .4387 - Correct?

  • Thread starter Thread starter goosey00
  • Start date Start date
goosey00
Messages
37
Reaction score
0
Solve for x:e^-0.38x=.3
I got .4387 Is that correct
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
goosey00 said:
Solve for x:e^-0.38x=.3
I got .4387 Is that correct

You can check by evaluating $e^{-0.38*0.4387}$
If we use google calculator we end up with 0.8467 (4sf) so 0.4387 is not correct.

What do you know about solving exponential equations and/or the natural logarithm?
 
I just can't remember how to put it in my calculator again. How did you get the .4387 to times by it-[FONT=MathJax_Math-italic-Web]e [FONT=MathJax_Main-Web]−[FONT=MathJax_Main-Web]0.38[FONT=MathJax_Main-Web]∗[FONT=MathJax_Main-Web]0.4387
 
goosey00 said:
I just can't remember how to put it in my calculator again. How did you get the .4387 to times by it-[FONT=MathJax_Math-italic-Web]e [FONT=MathJax_Main-Web]−[FONT=MathJax_Main-Web]0.38[FONT=MathJax_Main-Web]∗[FONT=MathJax_Main-Web]0.4387

Either
Code:
 [2nd] [ln] [(] [-][0.38] [x] [0.4387][)][=]

or
Code:
 [(] [-][0.38] [x] [0.4387][)][2nd] [ln][=]

You can also use an online calculator to check answers - I used google which you can see in the link above and there is also a MHB calculator which works. For your own calculator it may be prudent to find the manual online (search for "Ti30x user manual") so you're not stuck in an exam.

Bear in mind that was just a test to see if your answer was right (it isn't). You need to use the natural logarithm (ln) to find x.

$-0.38\ln(x) = ln(0.3)$
 
Hello, goosey00!

Solve for x:\;e^{-0.38x}\:=\:0.3

I got 0.4387 . Is that correct?
Can't you check your answer?
\text{We have: }\:e^{-0.38x} \;=\;0.3

\text{Take logs: }\:\ln(e^{-0.38x}) \;=\;\ln(0.3) \quad\Rightarrow\quad \text{-}0.38x\underbrace{\ln e}_{\text{This is 1}} \;=\;\ln(0.3)
. . . \text{-}0.38x \;=\;\ln(0.3) \quad\Rightarrow\quad x \;=\;\frac{\ln(0.3)}{\text{-}0.38}

. . . . . x \;=\;3.168\,349\,485
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Back
Top