There isn't going to be any simple "algebraic" way to solve that because you have the unknown, x, both inside and outside the logarithm. The first thing I would do is use CAF123's suggestion to change to natural logarithm: [itex]ln(x)/ln(10)= -4x+ 5[/itex] so that [itex]ln(x)= (-4/ln(10))x+ 5/ln(10)[/itex]. Now take the exponential of both sides:
[itex]x= e^{(-4ln(10))x}e^{5/ln(10)}[/itex]
[itex]xe^{(4/ln(10))x}= e^{5/ln(10)}[/itex]
Now let y= (4/ln(10))x so that x= (ln(10)/4)y and the equation becomes
[itex](ln(10)/4)ye^y= 5^{5/ln(10)}[/itex]
[tex]ye^y= \frac{5^{5/ln(10)}}{ln(10)/4}[/tex]
and therefore
[tex]y= W\left(\frac{5^{5/ln(10)}}{ln(10)/4)}\right)[/tex]
where "W" is Lambert's W function (
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lambert_W_function) which is defined as the inverse function to [itex]f(x)= xe^x[/itex]
(I
told you there was no simple "algebraic" solution!)
Since we defined y= (4/ln(10))x, we have, finally,
[tex]x= ln(10)\frac{W\left(\frac{5^{5/ln(10)}}{ln(10)/4)}\right)}{4}[/tex]
May you have joy of it!
Since this was posted under "Precalculus Mathematics", where in the world did you get this problem?