Solve Laplace Eq. in 1D: Head & Darcy Vel.

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on solving the one-dimensional Laplace equation with specified boundary conditions and heterogeneous hydraulic conductivities. Participants emphasize the need to treat the problem as two separate homogeneous systems due to the differing conductivities in the defined domains. The continuity of head and Darcy velocity at the interface is crucial for correctly applying boundary conditions and integrating the equations. Solutions for head at specific points (x=3, x=5, x=8) and Darcy velocity are derived using the appropriate equations and constants of integration. The final results show consistent values for head and Darcy velocity across different approaches.
Jgoshorn1
Messages
17
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Solve the Laplace equation in one dimension (x, i.e. (∂^2h)/(∂x^2)= 0)
Boundary conditions are as follows:
h= 1m @ x=0m
h= 13m @ x=10m
For 0≤x≤5 K1= 6ms^-1
For 5≤x≤10 K2 = 3ms^-1

What is the head at x = 3, x = 5, and x = 8?

What is the Darcy velocity (specific discharge)?


NOTE: There are multiple steps that will need to be done. Realize that system is heterogeneous. In a multiple layer system with steady-state conditions, Darcy velocity in one layer must equal the Darcy velocity in the other layers

Homework Equations



h(x) = ho - [(h0 - hD )/D]*x

The Attempt at a Solution



I tried to use the equation above subbing in 3, 5, and 8 for the x and using 10m as D, 1m as h0, and 13m for hD

Then I used the specific specific discharge for the Darcy's velocity (q=K(dh/dL))

That was apparently all wrong. Apparently this needs to be broken into 2 systems, coupled. Each individual system can be treated as homogenous. So it need two separate LaPlace equations? I really don't know what to do with this problem, please help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Since the discharge goes through both portions of the domain, you have continuity of the dependent variable h at the interface. In addition you also have continuity of discharge at the interface.

When you integrate the Laplace equation in 1-D, you have two constants of integration for each section of the domain. The matchings of discharge and h serve to eliminate some of the integration constants.
 
So, what I've done is set q(in) = q(out) => -K1(dh/dl)=K2(dh/dl) => 6((h-1)/5) = 3((13-h)/5) => h(@x=5) = 5m

Then I set the used set of boundary Conditions (BC) to interpret the solution to LaPlace in 1D (h=cx+D):
For BC @ x=0 and h=1 =>1=c(0)+D => 1=D
For BC @ x=5 and h=5 => 5=c(5)+1 => c=4/5
the I used h=cx+D again to solve for the head at x=3
=>h(@x=3)=(4/5)(3)+1=3.4

For the second system I used the point slope eq (y1-y)=m(x1-x) to get c
=> (5-13)/(5-10) = m = 8/5 = c
Then I used h=cx+D to solve for D
=> 5=(8/5)(5) + D => D=-3
Then to solve for h at x=8
h=cx+D => h(@x=8) => (8/5)(8)-3 = 9.8To get Darcy's velocity I just used q=K(dh/dl) for each system
System 1 = 6(4/5) = 4.8 = q
System 2 = 4(8/5) = 4.8 = q

Yes?
 
I get the same answers as you but went about the problem a little differently.

I solve the ODE over two separate domains:

h1(x)=c1+c2*x
h2(x)=c3+c4*x

I used the Dirichlet boundary conditions along with continuity of head and continuity of Darcy velocity to solve for the 4 constants of integration. Equations worked out to be:

h(x) = 1 + .8x 0<x<5

h(x) = -3 + 1.6x 5<x<10

The < signs should be weak inequalities. I cannot make them on my computer.
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top