Solve Maximum of a+b+c+d Without Wolfram

  • Thread starter Thread starter Numeriprimi
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving the equation system involving real numbers a, b, c, and d, where a + b = c + d, ad = bc, and ac + bd = 1, to find the maximum of a + b + c + d. The approach involves manipulating the equations to express a + b + c + d in terms of a and b, leading to the expression 2a + 2b. To maximize this expression, the third equation is used to relate b to a, specifically b = √(1 - a²). The challenge lies in determining the optimal value of a that maximizes the expression 2a + 2√(1 - a²). The thread concludes with a request for assistance in finding this maximum value of a.
Numeriprimi
Messages
135
Reaction score
0
Hey!
I found one difficult equation for me...
It is:
Valid for real numbers a, b, c, d:
a + b = c + d
ad = bc
ac + bd = 1
What is the maximum of a+b+c+d?

And DON'T SAY wolfram, really no wolfram... I used it and it isn't good.
So... have you got any idea?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Add ##a##c to both sides of the second equation, and you get
$$
ad + ac = ac + bc
\iff
a(c+d) = (a+b)c = (c+d)c.
$$
One possibility now would be ##c+d=0##, but then you'd also have ##a+b=0##, and so ##a+b+c+d=0##. So suppose ##c+d\neq0##, then ##a=c##, and from the first equation you also have ##b=d##.

Now you're really left with only two unknowns, which you can use in the third equation to make ##a+b+c+d=2a+2b## minimal.
 
Hmm... Sorry, bud I don't understand last line. Ok, a+b+c+d=2a+2b, yes, but how I find numerical value of a+b+c+d in second variant?
 
Your third equation says ##ac+bd=1##, i.e. ##a^2+b^2=1##, so if you assume ##b\geq0## (since you want ##2a+2b## to be maximal), you get ##b=\sqrt{1-a^2}##. This means you need to find a value ##a## for which ##2a+2b = 2a+2\sqrt{1-a^2}## is maximal.

Do you know how to find such an ##a##?
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top