Solve Organ Bath Problem with Guinea-Pig Ileum & Dog Mast Cells

  • Thread starter Thread starter MiniJo
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on designing an experiment to test the antihistamine properties of dried leaves using isolated guinea-pig ileum and dog mast cells. The proposed methodology includes control experiments to establish baseline responses to histamine and subsequent tests with the leaves to observe their effects on contraction and histamine release. There is uncertainty regarding the order of adding components in the organ bath, which could affect the results. A key concern raised is the need for additional experimental controls to ensure that any observed effects of the leaves are not independent of histamine. Overall, the approach is on the right track, but improvements in experimental design are necessary for clearer conclusions.
MiniJo
Messages
8
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A botanist friend of yours has returned from a trip to the rain forest. She brings with her a package of dried leaves which contains what native healers believe to be an antidote to severe itching. You have access to an organ bath set up in which you can set up an isolated guinea-pig ileum to record responses to added agonists as well as a dog mastocytoma-derived cell line that responds to stimuli with the release of histamine. How would you use these preparations to explore the potential mechanism underlying the putative therapeutic effects of the leaves?

Homework Equations


None

The Attempt at a Solution


Basically, this question is asking for the possible histamine-related effects of the leaves, if there are any. So I identified different stages to the experiment so far.

1. Control experiment.
The ileum has histamine receptors, therefore it will contract if it binds with histamine. Knowing this, I put the ileum into the organ bath and added histamine. Ideally this will produce a contraction.

2. Addition of leaves.
The leaves are believed to have antihistamine properties. So in another organ bath, I added the ileum, histamine and the leaves. I'm not sure what the best order for these additions is. Anyway. If the ileum stops contracting, then the leaves are inhibiting the reception of histamine or it's degrading the histamine. If the ileum continues to contract, then I'm not sure what's happening... maybe the leaves inhibit synthesis or release of histamine. We'll test this later.

3. To test for potential receptor blockade on the ileum or histamine degradation, prepare an organ bath, and add the ileum, a known histamine agonist, and the leaves. If the ileum contracts, we know that the leaves are responsible for degradation of histamine (since the agonist was able to be received). If there is no contraction, then the leaves are blocking the receptors. (Note that when I say "leaves" I actually mean some property of the leaves).

4. To test inhibition of release, set up another organ bath, and add the dog mast cells and the ileum. First as a control experiment, let the two things sit in the bath, making sure there's no contraction. Then stimulate the mast cells (UV, chemical agent...etc), this would cause degranulation, allowing the ileum to contract. In another organ bath, add the dog mast cells, the ileum and the leaves. Stimulate the mast cells to degranulate. If the ileum does not contract, then the leaves are interfering with degranulation (release of histamine). If the ileum does contract, then the leaves are ineffective against histamine.

5. To test for the inhibition of synthesis of histamine, we can add dog mast cells and ileum to an organ bath, stimulate the cells to degranulate and measure the level/amount of contraction in the ileum. Then, rinse the bath and add the leaves and mast cells immediately after. (These mast cells should have a lot less histamine compared to the beginning since they've just degranulated). Let the bath sit for a period of time. Add the ileum, then stimulate the mast cells again and measure the level of contraction in this second time around. If the level of contraction in the ileum is significantly less in the 2nd trial than in the first, then synthesis of histamine is inhibited by the leaves.

Does this seem like a proper solution?
If you see any flaws or have extra suggestions, please do tell me. I greatly appreciate any help. =)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You appear to be well along the right track here.
MiniJo said:
2. Addition of leaves.
The leaves are believed to have antihistamine properties. So in another organ bath, I added the ileum, histamine and the leaves. I'm not sure what the best order for these additions is. Anyway. If the ileum stops contracting, then the leaves are inhibiting the reception of histamine or it's degrading the histamine. If the ileum continues to contract, then I'm not sure what's happening... maybe the leaves inhibit synthesis or release of histamine. We'll test this later.
The one thing you have done pretty much in common for each experiment is to put everything in your organ bath at once. You do have a control that tests response to histamine alone, but how do you know the leaves aren't having an effect that is independent of histamine? I think there's an experimental control missing. (Your addition of histamine to the ileum bath is really a methodological control, to make sure your organ prep is working right, not an experimental control to help you directly test your hypothesis.)
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top