Solve Pin Jointed Frame Q1: Evaluate Reactions, Calculate Forces

  • Thread starter Thread starter qaisjc
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Frame Pin
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on solving a pin jointed frame problem involving reactions and member forces. The frame is supported at points A (roller joint) and D (pin joint), with dimensions AD = CD = 1m and BC = 2m. Participants emphasize the importance of using the three equilibrium equations to evaluate reactions at A and D, and to calculate forces in members AB, BC, and AC. Key calculations include determining the vertical reaction force at A (FAy = 10) and the vertical reaction force at D (FDy = -5), highlighting the significance of direction in force calculations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of static equilibrium principles
  • Familiarity with pin jointed frame mechanics
  • Knowledge of the method of joints for truss analysis
  • Ability to apply the equations of equilibrium: ΣFx=0, ΣFy=0, and ΣM=0
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the method of joints in truss analysis
  • Learn about calculating moments in static systems
  • Explore the implications of negative force values in structural analysis
  • Review examples of pin jointed frame problems for practical application
USEFUL FOR

Engineering students, structural analysts, and mechanics enthusiasts seeking to understand the principles of static equilibrium and force calculations in pin jointed frames.

qaisjc
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hey Guys, I've got a pretty simple (I think) pin joint frame question. I am pretty weak in this area of mechanics so if someone could advise me on how to go about doing this question i would really appreciate it.

The Figure Q1 (The Attatchment) shows a pin jointed frame.

The frame is supported

• At A by a roller joint and
• At D by a pin joint.
• AD = CD = 1m and BC = 2m.

a) Evaluate the reactions at A and D, i.e. the forces exerted on the frame by the supports.

b) Calculate the forces carried by the following members, indicating if they are in tension or compression.

i) AB
ii) BC
iii) AC
 

Attachments

  • Figure Q1.jpg
    Figure Q1.jpg
    8.9 KB · Views: 813
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello gaisjc and welcome to PF.

You must first calculate the reaction forces using the standard 3 equilibrium equations. Note that the roller support by definition must just have a vertical reaction. Then you can use the method of joints to solve for the member forces. You must show some attempt at a solution before we can be of further assistance, however weak that attempt may be..
 
Oops, my appologies. I haven't attempted a solution because I honastly don't know what to do. I realize I have to fine the moment at D using \SigmaMD=0 and use that to find Dx and Dy, then use the method of joints to solve for the member forces, but as to what numbers I use to find the moment at D, that's what confuses me.
 
qaisjc said:
Oops, my appologies. I haven't attempted a solution because I honastly don't know what to do. I realize I have to fine the moment at D using \SigmaMD=0 and use that to find Dx and Dy, then use the method of joints to solve for the member forces, but as to what numbers I use to find the moment at D, that's what confuses me.
Summing moments about D is a good idea, but first you should identify all unknown support reactions. You've already noted Dx and Dy. What about Ay?(As I noted earlier, there can be no Ax, just an Ay at support A). Now sum moments due to the applied force, and due to Ay, about D ,to solve for Ay. The member lengths are given. Note that the moment of a force about a point is the product of the force times the perpendicular distance from the line of action of that force to that point.
 
I really appreciate your help PhanthomJay. Ok, so this is what I've got so far;

\SigmaMDz=0, therefore (FAyx1)-(5x2)=0
therefore FAy=10

\SigmaFy=0, therefore FDy+10-5=0
therefore FDy=5

\SigmaFx=0 therefore FDx=0

Right? Or have I missed something?
 
qaisjc said:
I really appreciate your help PhanthomJay. Ok, so this is what I've got so far;

\SigmaMDz=0, therefore (FAyx1)-(5x2)=0
therefore FAy=10
Yes, but you must specify in which direction (up or down) that force acts on the frame.
\SigmaFy=0, therefore FDy+10-5=0
therefore FDy=5
well, actually, that works out to F_Dy = -5. What does that minus sign mean in regard to the direction of F_Dy?
\SigmaFx=0 therefore FDx=0
yes, correct.
Right? Or have I missed something?
Looks Ok, as long as you have your directions correct. Please watch your plus and minus signs. Once you're clear on the directions (up or down) that the vertical reaction forces exert on the frame, you can move onto the member force calculations.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
12K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
16K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
9K
Replies
7
Views
2K