MHB Solve Probability Inequality | Finite Probabilistic Space

AI Thread Summary
To solve the probability inequality Pr[A∩B] ≥ 9*Pr[A]*Pr[B] > 0, a finite probabilistic space can be defined with Ω = {a_1, a_2, ..., a_m} and uniform probabilities p(a_i) = 1/m for i = 1, 2, ..., m. By selecting events A = {a_1, a_2} and B = {a_1, a_3}, the condition simplifies to requiring m ≥ 36. This ensures that the intersection probability meets the inequality criteria. Thus, a finite space with at least 36 elements satisfies the problem's requirements.
alfred2
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Hi! I have to do this exercise:

Define a finite probabilistic Space (Ω; Pr[ ]) and 2 events A,B⊆ Ω and Pr[A] ≠ Pr so that we can verify that
Pr[A∩B]>=9*Pr[A]*Pr > 0. (1)
___________________________________________
I've been trying it but i have reached this conclusion:
If Pr[A]>0 Pr[A]=Pr[A∩B]/P[B|A]
IF Pr>0 Pr=Pr[A∩B]/P[A|B]
Substituting in (1) we have:
P[A|B]*P[A|B]>=9*Pr[A∩B]
I don't know if this help. Can anyone help me please? Thanks
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I solve the above question from an unanswered MHB thread.

Consider $\Omega=\{a_1,a_2,\ldots,a_m\}$ and the probabilty on $\mathcal{P}(\Omega)$ defined by: $$p(a_i)=\frac{1}{m}\quad \forall i=1,2,\ldots,m$$ Consider $A=\{a_1,a_2\}$ and $B=\{a_1,a_3\}$. Then, $$p(A\cap B)\ge 9p(A)p(B)\Leftrightarrow \frac{1}{m}\geq 9\cdot \frac{2}{m}\cdot\frac{2}{m}\Leftrightarrow 1\ge \frac{36}{m}\Leftrightarrow m\ge 36$$ That is, you only need to choose $\Omega$ with 36 elements.
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Back
Top