MHB Solve Prove by Induction: 3^2n+1 + 2^n-1 Divisible by 7

  • Thread starter Thread starter simcan18
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Induction
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on proving by induction that the expression 3^(2n+1) + 2^(n-1) is divisible by 7 for all integers n greater than or equal to 1. The base case has been established, and the inductive step involves showing that if the statement holds for n=k, it must also hold for n=k+1. The transformation of the expression during the inductive step is crucial, with participants noting the importance of rearranging the expression to highlight divisibility by 7. The discussion emphasizes the need for clarity in each step of the proof to ensure correctness. The problem-solving approach is centered on manipulating the expression to reveal its divisibility properties.
simcan18
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Can someone with understanding of proof by induction help with this problem?

Prove by induction that 3 raised to 2n+1 + 2 raised to n-1 is divisible by 7 for all numbers greater than/or equal to 1. How do you do the inductive step?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I have done the base case and some of the inductive..which I'm not sure I'm going in the right direction.
Inductive, So does it hold true for n=k+1
3 raised 2(k+1)+1 +2 raised(k+1)-1 = 3 raised 2k+2+1 +2 raised (k+1)-1
= 3 raised 2k+1 x 3 raised2 + 2 raised k x 2 raised 0
=9 x 3 raised 2k+1 + 1 x 2 raised k
= 27 x 3 raised 2k +1x2 raised k

Problem isn't posting correctly
 
$3^{2(k+1)+1}+2^{(k+1)-1}$​

$=\quad3^{2k+3}+2^k$

$=\quad9\cdot3^{2k+1}+2\cdot2^{k-1}$

$=\quad7\cdot3^{2k+1}+2\cdot\left(3^{2k+1}+2^{k-1}\right).$

It should be straightforward to proceed from here.

When doing problems of this kind, look at the number you want your expression to be divisible by (in this case $7$) and try and rearrange your expression to involve it.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top