Solve Redox Titration Problem w/ NaNO2 & KMnO4 - Help Needed!

  • Thread starter Thread starter Kail
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Redox
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving a redox titration problem involving potassium permanganate (KMnO4) and sodium nitrite (NaNO2). The balanced chemical equation is essential for determining the stoichiometric relationships between the reactants. To find the molar concentration of sodium nitrate, the number of moles of KMnO4 used must be calculated first, followed by the stoichiometric amount of NaNO2. The final concentration is obtained by dividing the moles of NaNO2 by its volume in liters (0.02 L). Understanding stoichiometric calculations is crucial for successfully completing this chemistry problem.
Kail
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I have many problesm with this question. Can somone help me please?

In a titration of patasium permanganate soloution with acidified sodium nitrate solution

MnO4- + BO2- H+ -----> Mn+2 + NO3- +H2O

45 ml of 0.05M of KMnO4 reacts complitely with 20.0 mL of NaNO2 solution.

Calculate the molat concentration of sodium nitrate.

Please give me a hand with this. I relly need help to pass my chimetry curse.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You must start with balanced equation. Once it is balanced calculate number of moles permanganate used and stoichiometric amount of sodium nitrate. Latter divided by 0.02L will give you concentration.
 
Sorry but I kinda dontt understand how to get the stoichiometric amount of sodium nitrate. And what do I have to divide by 0.02L. Sorry it's just I kinda not that good at chemestry.
 
Last edited:
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top