Solve the given first order PDE

chwala
Gold Member
Messages
2,825
Reaction score
413
Homework Statement
See attached. This question is set by me.
Relevant Equations
pde
Solve the given PDE for ##u(x,t)##;

##\dfrac{∂u}{∂t} +10 \dfrac{∂u}{∂x} + 9u = 0##

##u(x,0)= e^{-x}##

##-∞ <x<∞ , t>0##


In my lines i have,

##x_t = 10##

##x(t) = 10t+a##

##a = x(t) - 10t##

also,

##u(x(t),t)= u(x(0),0)e^{-9t}##

note this is from, integrating

##u_t[u(x(t),t] = -9u(x(t),t)## by use of separation of variables.

...

Therefore,

##u(x,t) = (e^{10t-x} ⋅e^{-9t})=e^{t-x}##

I hope i am getting the flow right... cheers.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
chwala said:
I hope i am getting the flow right... cheers.
The easiest way to check this is to insert your result in the original PDE and initial condition to verify that it is the solution.
 
chwala said:
I hope i am getting the flow right...

Orodruin said:
The easiest way to check this is to insert your result in the original PDE and initial condition to verify that it is the solution.
@chwala, what Orodruin said above is something I've also said at least once. If you're working problems at this level it's both essential and easy to do this sanity check on your work. I usually start by making sure the initial condition is satisfied, since that's easy to do. Then I verify that my solution satisfies the original ODE or PDE.
 
Since the equation is linear with constant coefficients, the solutions will be sums of exponentials. It makes sense, given the boundary condition, to try u(x,t) = T(t)e^{-x} with T(0) = 1. This yields <br /> e^{-x}\left( T&#039; - 10T + 9T\right) = 0 so that T&#039; - T = 0. Hence T(t) = e^{t} and <br /> u(x,t) = e^{t-x}.
 
pasmith said:
Since the equation is linear with constant coefficients, the solutions will be sums of exponentials.
The general solution is
$$
e^{-9t} f(x - 10t)
$$
That the result is a simple exponential is a consequence of the particular initial condition also being an exponential. Had the initial condition been ##u(x,0) = x^3##, then the result would have been
$$
u(x,t) = e^{-9t} (x - 10t)^3
$$
I am not sure I would call that a sum of exponentials.
 
Orodruin said:
The general solution is
$$
e^{-9t} f(x - 10t)
$$
That the result is a simple exponential is a consequence of the particular initial condition also being an exponential. Had the initial condition been ##u(x,0) = x^3##, then the result would have been
$$
u(x,t) = e^{-9t} (x - 10t)^3
$$
I am not sure I would call that a sum of exponentials.
...just looking at your perspective again...thanks

We have, ...

##u(x,t)= f(x-10t) e^{-9t}## as the general solution,

using initial condition, ##u(x,0) = f(x-10(0))⋅1=f(x)##

therefore, ##f(x)=e^{-x}##

##u(x,t)=e^-{x-10t} ⋅ e^{-9t}##

##u(x,t)=e^{-x+10t-9t}##

##u(x,t)=e^{-x+t}##
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top