Solved: Density of Induced Charge is 7.083*10-7 C/m2

  • Thread starter Thread starter Dell
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The density of the induced charge between two parallel boards with opposite charges is calculated to be 7.083 x 10-7 C/m2. The electric field between the boards is initially 2 x 105 V/m and reduces to 1.2 x 105 V/m when a dielectric is introduced. The calculations involve the permittivity of free space (ε0), the dielectric constant (K), and the area (A) of the boards. The final charge density is noted to be negative, indicating that it creates an electric field opposing the original field.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electric fields and charge density
  • Knowledge of dielectric materials and their effects on electric fields
  • Familiarity with the concept of permittivity (ε0)
  • Basic calculus for integrating electric field equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the effects of different dielectric materials on electric fields
  • Learn about the relationship between electric field strength and charge density
  • Explore advanced concepts in electrostatics, including Gauss's Law
  • Investigate practical applications of induced charge in capacitors
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, electrical engineering, and anyone interested in understanding electrostatics and the behavior of electric fields in the presence of dielectric materials.

Dell
Messages
555
Reaction score
0
2 parrallel boards are charged with an equal and oposite charge, when the area between them is emptied, the electric field reaches 2*105 V/m. when the area is filled with a dialectric substance, the field is reduced to 1.2*105V/m. what is the density of the induced charge??

this is what i have done so far, could someone tell me if it is correct, and if not where i am going wrong.

E=1.2*105
E0=2*105

K=E0/E=5/3

∫Kε0EdA=Qfree
==>Qfree0KEA

∫ε0EdA=Qfree+Qinduced
==>Qinduced0KEA-ε0EA

Qind/A=ε0E(1-K)

0(1.2-2)*105

=7.083*10-7C/m2
 
Physics news on Phys.org
∫ε0EdA=Qfree+Qinduced
==>Qinduced0KEA-ε0EA

Seems you messed up the negative sign here, but you corrected it in the following line. The rest looks good, I believe though that the final charge density should be written as negative since it makes an electric field in the opposite direction to reduce the total field. But that depends on how picky the grader is.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
Replies
44
Views
4K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
13K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K