Solving 1.8.5 Part b): Is It a Counterexample?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ehrenfest
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Counterexample
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a mathematical problem from a textbook, specifically focusing on parts a) and b) of a problem labeled 1.8.5. Participants are examining the validity of a proposed counterexample and exploring related inequalities in part b) of another problem, 1.8.7.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are questioning whether a specific example serves as a counterexample to part a) and discussing the implications of changing the equation from a+b=1 to a+b=2. There is also a debate about the correct interpretation of the inequality in part b) of 1.8.7, with differing opinions on what needs to be shown.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing insights and corrections to each other's interpretations. Some guidance has been offered regarding the inequalities, but there is no explicit consensus on the correct approach or interpretation of the problems.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working under the constraints of the original problem statements and are grappling with potential ambiguities in the wording of the problems, particularly in part b) of 1.8.7.

ehrenfest
Messages
2,001
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


Is what I wrote on the left hand margin a counterexample to 1.8.5 part a) ?

EDIT: I meant part b)

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution

 

Attachments

  • larsen185.jpg
    larsen185.jpg
    11.6 KB · Views: 449
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes. (For b).
 
And changing a+b=1 to a+b=2 makes the inequality correct, right?

Also, in part b) of 1.8.7, are they asking me to show that 1/(a+c) < 1/(b+c) + 1/(a+b) ?
 
ehrenfest said:
And changing a+b=1 to a+b=2 makes the inequality correct, right?
At a+b=2, you will not see the equality. There's a lower value of a+b that will realize this.
 
ehrenfest said:
Also, in part b) of 1.8.7, are they asking me to show that 1/(a+c) < 1/(b+c) + 1/(a+b) ?
I think not (it's poorly written).

I think they want you to show : 1/(b+c) < 1/(a+c) + 1/(a+b)
 
Gokul43201 said:
I think not (it's poorly written).

I think they want you to show : 1/(b+c) < 1/(a+c) + 1/(a+b)

How is that different? The problem is symmetric in a,b,and c; they are just the lengths of the three sides of a triangle.

Gokul43201 said:
At a+b=2, you will not see the equality. There's a lower value of a+b that will realize this.

What should the problem be then?
 
Last edited:
ehrenfest said:
How is that different? The problem is symmetric in a,b,and c; they are just the lengths of the three sides of a triangle.
Doh! Right - I can't remember what I was thinking.

What should the problem be then?
Several possibilities. For one, a+b=\sqrt{2}, everything else unchanged.
 
For 1.8.5, with Gokul's correction, I still don't see how to prove it. I find that the inequality is equivalent to:

2 \leq a^2+b^2+ab(y/x +x/y)

y/x+x/y is greater than or equal to 2, but I do not see how that helps.

For 1.8.6, I found that the inequality is equivalent to:

b^2 &lt; a^2 + b(a+c)+ac+c^2

which I am not sure how to prove.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K