Solving 1995 Putnam Math Problem: Unclear Statement

  • Thread starter Thread starter ehrenfest
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a 1995 Putnam math problem, specifically focusing on a statement within the provided solution that participants find unclear. The problem involves polynomial transformations and the implications of certain coefficients.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the transformation from a quartic polynomial to a quadratic form, questioning the validity of this change. There is discussion about the interpretation of coefficients and the meaning of "positive square roots" in the context of the problem.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively questioning specific aspects of the problem and the solution, with some suggesting alternative interpretations of the coefficients involved. There is a recognition of potential errors in the solution, particularly regarding the linear coefficient, but no consensus has been reached.

Contextual Notes

There is a noted confusion regarding the transformation of polynomial degrees and the implications of the terms used in the problem statement. Participants are grappling with the definitions and assumptions underlying the mathematical expressions presented.

ehrenfest
Messages
2,001
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


Here is the problem:
http://www.unl.edu/amc/a-activities/a7-problems/putnam/-pdf/1995.pdf

Here is the solution:
http://www.unl.edu/amc/a-activities/a7-problems/putnam/-pdf/1995s.pdf

In the solution, I am not sure why the sentence that starts (ironically) with "Clearly, then" is true?

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
They probably mean (b^2 - 2) instead of (b^2 + 2), in which case it follows from the above observation.
 
But the "above observation" contains a quartic polynomial and in that sentence it is a quadratic. I do not understand how that transformation happened...
 
Right, but do you notice anything special about the above quartic? Try setting y=x^2. Do you see the relevance of the phrase "positive square roots" now?
 
I know I am missing something really obvious, but if you set y = x^2, you get

y^2 - (b^2-1)y+1 = 0

I am not sure where the sqrt of the linear coefficient comes from...
 
ehrenfest said:
I know I am missing something really obvious, but if you set y = x^2, you get

y^2 - (b^2-1)y+1 = 0

I am not sure where the sqrt of the linear coefficient comes from...

I see. The square root of the linear coefficient should not be there! Also, when they say positive square roots they mean the squares of the positive roots, right?
 
Am I right about the square root being incorrect on the linear coefficient?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K