Solving Question B3 from the 1999 Putnam Exam

  • Thread starter Thread starter ehrenfest
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Exam
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a specific limit problem from the 1999 Putnam Exam, particularly focusing on the manipulation of a double sum involving variables x and y. Participants are examining the steps leading to a particular equality in the solution and exploring various methods of simplification and factorization.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss finding common denominators and factoring terms in the numerator. There are attempts to rewrite the problem in a more familiar form and to compute sums by separating even and odd indices. Questions arise regarding the clarity of collecting terms with respect to x and the implications of polynomial representation.

Discussion Status

The conversation is ongoing, with various approaches being explored. Some participants have suggested methods for simplifying the expression, while others are seeking clarification on specific steps. There is no explicit consensus yet, but multiple lines of reasoning are being examined.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working within the constraints of the exam problem, which may limit the information available for solving the limit. The nature of the problem encourages exploration of assumptions and the structure of the expressions involved.

ehrenfest
Messages
2,001
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


At this link, in the solution to question B3,
http://www.unl.edu/amc/a-activities/a7-problems/putnam/-pdf/1999s.pdf
how did they get the second-to-last equality? Right above the words "and the desired limit is"?

I tried factoring every way I know how and it did not work out!

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
It seemed straightforward to grind it out.

After finding a common denominator, xy is clearly a factor of the numerator. If you collect terms w.r.t. x, 1-y is clearly a factor of each coefficient. (And by symmetry, the same will be true when you collect terms w.r.t. y)



Alternatively, if you just attempted to naively compute the limit without bothering to factor, you'd see that

xy * [ 1 - x^2 + x^3 y^2 - y^2 + x^2 y^3 - x^3 y^3 ]

has a zero at x = 1. Therefore, x-1 must be a factor, and so you can divide it out of the numerator and denominator. Similarly for y-1.



Incidentally, you don't have to be quite so clever to solve this problem. If you simply rearrange the sum for S(x, y) into an ordinary double sum (maybe, split it into even n and odd n), it looks like you can just brute force compute the closed form for S(x, y) by repeatedly applying the geometric series formula.
 
Last edited:
Incidentally, what I said is surely what I would have done if I were actually taking the exam.

(1) Rewrite the problem in a familiar form.
[tex]S = \sum_{\frac{1}{2} \leq \frac{m}{n} \leq 2} x^m y^n<br /> =<br /> \sum_{n = 1}^{+\infty} \sum_{m = \lceil \frac{n}{2} \rceil}^{2n} x^m y^n[/tex]

(2) To eliminate the ceiling function, separate into even and odd n.

[tex]S_1 = \sum_{p = 1}^{+\infty} \sum_{m = p}^{4p-2} x^m y^{2p-1}[/tex]

[tex]S_2 = \sum_{p = 1}^{+\infty} \sum_{m = p}^{4p} x^m y^{2p}[/tex]

[tex]S = S_1 + S_2[/tex]

(3) Compute the inner sum.

[tex]S_1 = \sum_{p = 1}^{+\infty} y^{2p-1}<br /> \frac{x^{4p - 1} - x^p}{x - 1}[/tex]

(4) Separate the sums and compute again.

[tex]S_1 = \frac{1}{x-1} ( S_{1,1} - S_{1,2} )[/tex]

[tex]S_{1,1} = \sum_{p=1}^{+\infty} y^{2p-1} x^{4p-1}<br /> = \frac{y x^3}{1 - y^2 x^4}[/tex]

[tex]S_{1,2} = \sum_{p=1}^{+\infty} y^{2p-1} x^{p}[/tex]

And so forth.



Once I get the closed form solution, unless I make a lucky observation, I would either

(A) Manage to factor the numerator.
(B) Plug in x=1 and thus notice that x-1 must be a factor.
(C) Realize that the limit can only exist if the x-1 in the denominator gets canceled out in the numerator.
 
Last edited:
Hurkyl said:
After finding a common denominator, xy is clearly a factor of the numerator. If you collect terms w.r.t. x, 1-y is clearly a factor of each coefficient. (And by symmetry, the same will be true when you collect terms w.r.t. y)

What do you mean collect terms with respect the variable x? Do you mean write it as a polynomial in x? I do not see how that is straightforward?
 
Last edited:
Example of collecting terms in x:

1 + y + x - x^2 - xy^2 - x^2 y = (1 + y) + (1 - y^2) x - (1 + y) x^2
 
OK. Thanks.
 

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K