I Solving 2-Body Problem w/ Lagrangian: What Substitutions?

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter EduardoToledo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    2-body Lagrangian
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on solving the classical two-body problem using the Lagrangian principle, specifically addressing the issue of substitutions before taking partial derivatives. The original poster encountered differing results after substituting angular velocity and seeks clarification on appropriate substitutions. They suggest that substitutions involving holonomic constraints may be relevant but request a demonstration to support this. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding the implications of these substitutions in the context of Lagrangian mechanics. Overall, the thread aims to clarify the correct approach to substitutions in solving the two-body problem.
EduardoToledo
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hi, I was trying to solve the classical two body problem with Lagrangian Principle. I replaced the angular velocity before taking the partial derivatives (which respect to the distance to the virtual particle) and the result was completely different. I would like to ask, therefore, which substitutions can I do before taking these partial derivatives. I think the answer may be "the ones with holonomic constraints", but I really would like the demonstration for that
substitution in euler lagrangian equation.JPG
.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
EduardoToledo said:
I would like to ask, therefore, which substitutions can I do before taking these partial derivatives
$$q\mapsto f(t,Q),\quad \dot q\mapsto f_t+f_Q\dot Q$$
 
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field'

Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field'

Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
View full post »

Thread 'Off resonance driving of a MW/RF cavity'

Hello! Let's say I have a cavity resonant at 10 GHz with a Q factor of 1000. Given the Lorentzian shape of the cavity, I can also drive the cavity at, say 100 MHz. Of course the response will be very very weak, but non-zero given that the Loretzian shape never really reaches zero. I am trying to understand how are the magnetic and electric field distributions of the field at 100 MHz relative to the ones at 10 GHz? In particular, if inside the cavity I have some structure, such as 2 plates...
View full post »

Similar threads

I Mathematical proof for the Lagrangian function
Replies
4
Views
1K
I Lagrangian density of a linearly elastic string under gravity
Replies
6
Views
1K
I Lagrangian for pendulum
Replies
11
Views
2K
I Requirement of Holonomic Constraints for Deriving Lagrange Equations
Replies
1
Views
1K
I Taylor expansion about lagrangian in noether
Replies
1
Views
1K
I Lagrangian doesn't change when adding total time derivative
Replies
19
Views
3K
I Confused about applying the Euler–Lagrange equation
Replies
3
Views
1K
I Why isn't the Lagrangian invariant under ##\theta## rotations?
Replies
5
Views
2K
A An ab initio Hilbert space formulation of Lagrangian mechanics
Replies
10
Views
2K
A Mass measurement in a Penning trap
Replies
0
Views
794

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top