I Solving 2-Body Problem w/ Lagrangian: What Substitutions?

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter EduardoToledo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    2-body Lagrangian
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on solving the classical two-body problem using the Lagrangian principle, specifically addressing the issue of substitutions before taking partial derivatives. The original poster encountered differing results after substituting angular velocity and seeks clarification on appropriate substitutions. They suggest that substitutions involving holonomic constraints may be relevant but request a demonstration to support this. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding the implications of these substitutions in the context of Lagrangian mechanics. Overall, the thread aims to clarify the correct approach to substitutions in solving the two-body problem.
EduardoToledo
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hi, I was trying to solve the classical two body problem with Lagrangian Principle. I replaced the angular velocity before taking the partial derivatives (which respect to the distance to the virtual particle) and the result was completely different. I would like to ask, therefore, which substitutions can I do before taking these partial derivatives. I think the answer may be "the ones with holonomic constraints", but I really would like the demonstration for that
substitution in euler lagrangian equation.JPG
.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
EduardoToledo said:
I would like to ask, therefore, which substitutions can I do before taking these partial derivatives
$$q\mapsto f(t,Q),\quad \dot q\mapsto f_t+f_Q\dot Q$$
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Back
Top