Solving 3 Body Elastic Collision Problem - Littlepig

  • Thread starter Thread starter Littlepig
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Body Collision
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving a three-body elastic collision problem where the initial velocities and masses of the particles are known. The challenge is that conservation of energy and momentum provides only two equations for three unknown final velocities. An assumption is needed to solve for the third variable, with suggestions including setting the final velocity of one particle equal to another. A proposed method involves treating the system as a two-body problem in the center-of-mass frame, where momentum is zero, allowing for the reversal of velocities. This approach can be applied to all particles involved in the collision.
Littlepig
Messages
97
Reaction score
0
Hi.
I'm having some problem solving this problem: Consider a 3 body elastic collision; 3 bodies on 1 axe; both have known initial velocity≠0 and mass≠0, Particle 2 is between of 1 and 3 so that v1>0 and (v2 >0 or v2<0) and v3<0.
Now, can I calculate the final velocity of all particles without assumptions??

Energy and momentum conservation only gives 2 equations for 3 variables.

However, if one make an assumption(like final velocity of 1 is equal final velocity of 2), one can solve it. This leads to my second question: assuming mass of 2 >> mass 1 and mass 2>> mass 3, can you suggest one assumption physically plausible in a way that final velocity of 2≠0 ? (particles have no special configuration, like rectangles or circles)

I was thinking of having some fraction of final velocity of 1 as final velocity of 2, but I'm not sure if it is plausible nor what fraction should i use use...xD

Thanks in advance,
Littlepig
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Think of the particles at point of collision: P1,P2,P3.
Now think of them as a system of [P1] and [P2,P3] - that is, a two-body problem.

The technique for solving the two-body problem is to convert to the Center-of-mass-at-rest frame of reference. In that COM/rest frame, total momentum is zero.

The only possible solution for the velocities after collision, if total momentum is zero, is that they reverse - that is [P1] has +v coming in, and -v going out. For two-body problem, you can prove this.

So you can solve 1/3rd of the problem: Convert to COM-at-rest frame, reverse the velocity of P1, and then convert back to the Lab frame.

Do you see that the same logic will hold for P3? And that then the same holds for P2?

Regards, BobM
 
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Back
Top