Solving a Cubic Equation: Methods and Terminology

  • Thread starter Thread starter chwala
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cubic
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around solving a cubic equation of the form ##x^3y + 4x - 32 = 0##. Participants explore methods for finding integer solutions and the implications of the equation's structure.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants question the simplification of the equation and the assumptions regarding integer solutions. There are discussions about using implicit differentiation and the inverse function theorem, as well as rewriting the equation to explore its properties. Some participants express curiosity about the terminology related to cubic equations.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with various participants offering insights and alternative approaches. Some guidance has been provided regarding the nature of the equation and potential methods for exploring solutions. There is an acknowledgment of the complexity of the problem and the need for further exploration.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the equation may not behave like a typical cubic equation and discuss the implications of seeking integer solutions. There is also mention of constraints related to the nature of the solutions and the possibility of infinite solutions.

chwala
Gold Member
Messages
2,835
Reaction score
426
Homework Statement
find ##x## if ##2x(x^2y+4)=64##
Relevant Equations
cubic equations
##x^3y+4x-32=0##

is there a particular method for solving this? i know that ##x=2## and ##y=3##
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think you did not simplify correctly. I also assume you want integer solutions. Your 2 could have canceled out. After that, maybe you can solve for ##x## as a cubic and see what conditions on the solution produce integers.If I may, yours seems like unusual topics. Are you self -studying or taking a class?
 
WWGD said:
I think you did not simplify correctly. I also assume you want integer solutions. Your 2 could have canceled out. After that, maybe you can solve for ##x## as a cubic and see what conditions on the solution produce integers.If I may, yours seems like unusual topics. Are you self -studying or taking a class?

i am coming up with my own problems actually. I create them...self- study mate
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: WWGD
WWGD said:
I think you did not simplify correctly. I also assume you want integer solutions. Your 2 could have canceled out. After that, maybe you can solve for ##x## as a cubic and see what conditions on the solution produce integers.If I may, yours seems like unusual topics. Are you self -studying or taking a class?
what do you mean by saying i did not simplify correctly? I think my equation is mathematically correct!
 
chwala said:
what do you mean by saying i did not simplify correctly? I think my equation is mathematically correct!
Ah, I thought you had done something else. Are you familiar with the inverse or implicit function theorem? Edit: Or solve the cubic and see the conditions needed to find integer solutions.
 
Last edited:
WWGD said:
Ah, I thought you had done something else. Are you familiar with the inverse or implicit function theorem? Edit: Or solve the cubic and see the conditions needed to find integer solutions.

i know implicit differentiation...guide me on the steps...
 
I think my suggestion on differentiation may not have been the best. I think solving the cubic and finding conditions for integer solutions may be the best approach here. I need to be out for a while, will be back.
 
##3x^{2}+x^3y^{'}+4=0##
##x^{3}y^{'}=-4-3x^2y##
 
WWGD said:
I think my suggestion on differentiation may not have been the best. I think solving the cubic and finding conditions for integer solutions may be the best approach here. I need to be out for a while, will be back.

ok i will also be awaiting more advice from other experts here...
 
  • #10
This equation has infinitely many solutions.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: chwala and archaic
  • #11
Rewrite it like this : ##y(x^3+\frac{4}{y}x-\frac{32}{y})=0##
Capture.PNG

Derivation : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cubic_equation#Derivation_of_the_roots
For ##y = 0## you just need to solve ##4x-32=0##.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: chwala
  • #13
chwala said:
i will look at this, what's the name of the theorem? you guys are awesome:wink:

Bingo...
 
  • #14
chwala said:
Homework Statement:: find ##x## if ##2x(x^2y+4)=64##
Homework Equations:: cubic equations

##x^3y+4x-32=0##

is there a particular method for solving this? i know that ##x=2## and ##y=3##
Writing the equation in the form, ##x(x^2y+4)=32##, shows that ##x## cannot be zero.

Solving the equation for ##y##, shows that it's not so much like a cubic equation as it is a rational function, especially if you're looking for integer solutions.

##y=\dfrac{4(8-x)}{x^3}##

Just plug in a value for ##x##, get a value for ##y##.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: chwala and archaic
  • #15
Yes, Your equation is just a relation between two variables, x and y.
Soution? Well, you could call the equation x = ... in #14 a solution.
You easily see from it that the relation between x and y it specifies is continuous except at x = 0, and that it covers an infinite range.
You have a simple relation y = a function of x in #14. You can work out a relation of form x = a function of y as told - but why bother? It is still saying the same thing in a more complicated way. in other cases you may not be able to work it out (cannot solve the equation algebraically) so you always go for the one that is simpler - in fact you are lucky that there is one, in many cases you can't get either an x =... or a y =... form, though you still have a relation which corresponds to a curve in two dimensions.

If you want whole number solutions, at least with small whole numbers, then I think the best way is simply to use a graphing calculator or app and see whether the graphed function goes through any small numbers. That immediately gave me your solution and also x = -2, y = -5.

I suspect you could prove without too much difficulty that there are no other whole number (er, integer) solutions but I am not personally tempted to make the effort.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: chwala
  • #16
  • #17
WWGD said:
I think my suggestion on differentiation may not have been the best. I think solving the cubic and finding conditions for integer solutions may be the best approach here. I need to be out for a while, will be back.

so this problem cannot be solved as per your approach- differentiation...
 
  • #18
chwala said:
so this problem cannot be solved as per your approach- differentiation...
No, I misunderstood your question. I thought you just wanted to express y as a function of x. It was like 2 a.m. and I could barely read my phone. I don't think it would take us too far.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: chwala
  • #19
WWGD said:
No, I misunderstood your question. I thought you just wanted to express y as a function of x. It was like 2 a.m. and I could barely read my phone. I don't think it would take us too far.

ok no worries am liking it here, ...
 
  • #20
chwala said:
ok no worries am liking it here, ...
PF: Where nerds meet... ;).
 
  • Haha
Likes   Reactions: chwala
  • #21
chwala said:
archaic thanks for this.

so is this the general way of solving the cubic equations that (do not have a quadratic factor) i.e.
ax^3+bx+c=0?
... are they referred to as depressed cubics? this is new to me...

Hi chwala:

This from Standard Mathematical Tables, Page 344 (1957 ed.).
y3 + py2 + qy + r = 0​
Substituting y = x - p/3 yields
x3 + ax + b = 0, where​
a = (1/3)(3q - p2) and​
b = (1/27)(2p3 - 9pq + 27r)​

Regards,
Buzz
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: chwala

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K