Solving a Logarithmic Equation with an Irrational Result

  • Thread starter Thread starter e^(i Pi)+1=0
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Log
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
6 replies · 2K views
e^(i Pi)+1=0
Messages
246
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


27x+1=32x+1

The Attempt at a Solution



log(27x+1)=log(32x+1)

(x+1)log(27)=(2x+1)log(3)

2x+1=[itex]\frac{(x+1)log(27)}{log(3)}[/itex]

[itex]\frac{2x+1}{x+1}=\frac{log(27)}{log(3)}[/itex]

x=-2

I'm wondering how I would have continued solving this for the exact answer if [itex]\frac{log(27)}{log(3)}[/itex] had turned out to be irrational?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
e^(i Pi)+1=0 said:

Homework Statement


27x+1=32x+1

The Attempt at a Solution



log(27x+1)=log(32x+1)

(x+1)log(27)=(2x+1)log(3)

2x+1=[itex]\frac{(x+1)log(27)}{log(3)}[/itex]

[itex]\frac{2x+1}{x+1}=\frac{log(27)}{log(3)}[/itex]

x=-2

I'm wondering how I would have continued solving this for the exact answer if [itex]\frac{log(27)}{log(3)}[/itex] had turned out to be irrational?

If log(m)/log(n) was irrational (call it p), then you'd just have solved it with algebra the usual way to get x in terms of p.

i.e.

(2x+1) = px + p

x(2-p) = p-1

x = (p-1)/(2-p)

That would be an exact answer, but it wouldn't be a "nice number" (an integer or even a rational answer).
 
e^(i Pi)+1=0 said:

Homework Statement


27x+1=32x+1


The Attempt at a Solution



log(27x+1)=log(32x+1)

(x+1)log(27)=(2x+1)log(3)

2x+1=[itex]\frac{(x+1)log(27)}{log(3)}[/itex]

[itex]\frac{2x+1}{x+1}=\frac{log(27)}{log(3)}[/itex]

x=-2

I'm wondering how I would have continued solving this for the exact answer if [itex]\frac{log(27)}{log(3)}[/itex] had turned out to be irrational?


Saying "log(a)" and "log(b)" IS exact, even if you can't express those as rational numbers.

xlog(a) + log(a) = 2x(log(b)) + log(b)

x[log(a) - 2log(b)] = log(b) - log(a)

[tex]x = \frac{\log(b) - \log(a)}{\log(a) - 2\log(b)}[/tex]

and that would be your final answer, which is very much exact.
 
(2x+1) = px + p

x(2-p) = p-1

I am probably being incredibly dense, but I don't follow what you did here.
 
cepheid said:
Saying "log(a)" and "log(b)" IS exact, even if you can't express those as rational numbers.

Yeah I realize that, it's like [itex]\sqrt{2}[/itex]. The problem I'm having is with the algebra.
 
Got it, I really was being dense. Thank you.
 
e^(i Pi)+1=0 said:
(2x+1) = px + p

x(2-p) = p-1

I am probably being incredibly dense, but I don't follow what you did here.

[tex]\frac{2x+1}{x+1}=\frac{a}{b}[/tex]
[tex]2x+1=\frac{a}{b}(x+1)[/tex]
[tex]2x+1=\frac{a}{b}x+\frac{a}{b}[/tex]
[tex]2x-\frac{a}{b}x+1=\frac{a}{b}[/tex]
[tex]2x-\frac{a}{b}x=\frac{a}{b}-1[/tex]
[tex]x\left (2-\frac{a}{b}\right )=\frac{a}{b}-1[/tex]
[tex]x=\frac{\frac{a}{b}-1}{2-\frac{a}{b}}[/tex]

edit: nvm, you got it