Solving a Related Rates Problem: Calculating Eva Wisnierska's Temperature Change

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves calculating the rate of temperature change experienced by paraglider Eva Wisnierska as she ascended during a thunderstorm. The context is related rates, specifically examining how temperature varies with altitude based on provided data points.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the nature of the problem, with some suggesting it is a related rates problem while others argue it is more about estimating the slope of a temperature curve from data. There are attempts to calculate the temperature change per altitude and convert it to a rate per minute based on ascent speed.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with various interpretations being explored. Some participants provide calculations and suggest using surrounding data points for better accuracy, while others question the validity of certain approaches and calculations without reaching a consensus.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the importance of using multiple data points for accurate slope estimation and discuss the implications of the vertical speed on the temperature change rate. There is an emphasis on ensuring units are consistent throughout the calculations.

oates151
Messages
11
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


On February 16, 2007, paraglider Eva Wisnierska was caught in a freak thunderstorm over
Australia and carried upward at a speed of about 3000 ft/min. The table below gives the
temperature at various heights. Approximately how fast (in ◦F/min) was her ambient
temperature decreasing when she was at 4000 feet?
image.jpg



Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



Well here's where I've gotten.

I am not sure, but this problem looks like some sort of related rates problem. We known dy/dt is 3000 ft/min, but we need in deg F/min, so what I did is a simple slope calculation for the point 4000 ft by doing

(60-52)/(2-4) and getting -4 deg F/1000 ft

From here, I'm not exactly sure how to manipulate and get the rate that we need. Am I on the right track? What's next?

Thanks so much!

-Pat
 
Physics news on Phys.org


oates151 said:

Homework Statement


On February 16, 2007, paraglider Eva Wisnierska was caught in a freak thunderstorm over
Australia and carried upward at a speed of about 3000 ft/min. The table below gives the
temperature at various heights. Approximately how fast (in ◦F/min) was her ambient
temperature decreasing when she was at 4000 feet?
image.jpg



Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



Well here's where I've gotten.

I am not sure, but this problem looks like some sort of related rates problem. We known dy/dt is 3000 ft/min, but we need in deg F/min, so what I did is a simple slope calculation for the point 4000 ft by doing

(60-52)/(2-4) and getting -4 deg F/1000 ft

From here, I'm not exactly sure how to manipulate and get the rate that we need. Am I on the right track? What's next?
I would use the two alt., temp. points on either side. Between 2000' and 4000' the temperature dropped 8 deg F., but between 4000' and 6000', the temperature drop was quite a bit more. You would get a better estimate by using the two surrounding points in your data.

I disagree that this is a related rates problem. As I see it, it's a problem about estimating the slope of a curve from a set of data.
 


Oh, I see. So on that case, in order to get a more accurate method, i'd calculate the slope between the two surrounding points which gets us -5.5 deg f/1000 ft.

Now, they want the units in in deg F/min. Since she's carried upward at 3000 ft/min and the temperature is decreasing at -5.5 deg f/1000 ft, then

(3000 ft/min)(-5.5 deg f/1000ft)= 3 x -5.5 /min = 36 x -5.5 = -198 in deg F/min ?
 


No, I don't think so. Her vertical speed is 3000 ft/min. She rose from 2000' to 6000' in 4000/3000 minutes, or 4/3 minute, during which time the temperature dropped 22 deg. F. That's NOT going to be a drop of 198 deg F per minute.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
14K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
12K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
7K