Solving Absolute Value Problem: x ≤ 3

ziaharipur
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Suppose we have this absolute value question | x-3 | = 3 – x
If we solve this question we break it as
X - 3 = 3 – x or -(x - 3) = 3 - x
Now if we solve it we come to know that the part on right is true for all real numbers
And the part on the left is true for only 3

I also have read that if there is a variable on right side of absolute value then we need to verify our solutions.
Now we have two solution one is 3 and the other one is all real numbers. The first solution works but there is a problem with the second one, Suppose we have a real number 4 and we put it in our absolute value equation

| x – 3 | = 3 – x
| 4 – 3 | = 3 – 4
| 1 | = -1
Now when we verify our solution we discard the solution not satisfying the equation as in this case the second solution is not satisfying the solution. So, we have only one solution to this equation and that is 3.

But when I saw the answer of this question in the book I saw that the answer is x < =3

Now I am confuse please help me.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Notice that in order for the equation

<br /> |x -3| = 3 - x<br />

to be satisfied, 3 - x must be greater-than-or-equal-to zero, since the left side of the equation is. Do you see how that fact leads to the solution?
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top