Solving Chain Rule Problem with Equation (7.8)

  • Thread starter Thread starter Robin04
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Chain Chain rule
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on understanding Equation (7.8) from a paper on wave foundations, specifically regarding the application of the chain rule in taking second derivatives. The user initially misinterpreted the relationship between the variables involved in the equation but later clarified that both \(\partial_u{\tilde{q}}\) and \(\partial_s{\tilde{q}}\) are interdependent. This realization allowed the user to arrive at the correct result, confirming that the second derivative can indeed be derived using the chain rule correctly.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of partial derivatives and their applications
  • Familiarity with the chain rule in calculus
  • Basic knowledge of wave equations and their mathematical representations
  • Ability to interpret academic papers in mathematics or physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of the chain rule in multivariable calculus
  • Review the concept of second partial derivatives in calculus
  • Examine wave equations and their derivations in mathematical physics
  • Read academic papers on the foundations of wave theory for deeper insights
USEFUL FOR

Students and researchers in mathematics and physics, particularly those dealing with calculus and wave equations, will benefit from this discussion.

Robin04
Messages
259
Reaction score
16

Homework Statement


https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1007&context=foundation_wave
I'm trying to understand this paper and I'm stuck at equation (7.8). That part of the text is very short so I hope you don't mind if I don't copy the equations here.

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


I understand how I get (7.7). But if I want to take the second derivate I can just apply the chainrule again. ##\partial_t^2{q} = \partial_t{[v(\partial_u{\tilde{q}}-\partial_s{\tilde{q}})]} = v[\partial^2_u{\tilde{q}}\partial_t{u}-\partial^2_s{\tilde{q}}\partial_t{s}] = v^2[\partial^2_u{\tilde{q}}+\partial^2_s{\tilde{q}}]##
But in the text it looks like if the author raised it to the power two (and got a different result) and I don't see why is that the same operation as taking the second derivative.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I posted too soon, I realized what I did wrong. ##\partial_u{\tilde{q}}## is also dependent on s and so does the derivative with respect to s depend on u. With this, I got the same result.
 
First of all, what is your background in math? Do you understand what is second partial derivative?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K