Solving Circuits: Finding V_1-V_3

  • Context: Engineering 
  • Thread starter Thread starter VinnyCee
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Circuits
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on solving a circuit problem to determine the voltages V_1, V_2, and V_3 using Kirchhoff's Current Law (KCL) and Ohm's Law (V = iR). The final calculated values are V_1 = 18.86 V, V_2 = 6.286 V, and V_3 = 13 V. The solution involves setting up equations based on current through resistors and employing matrix reduction to find the voltages. The approach is validated by confirming the calculations align with KCL principles.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Kirchhoff's Current Law (KCL)
  • Proficiency in Ohm's Law (V = iR)
  • Familiarity with matrix operations and row reduction
  • Basic knowledge of circuit analysis techniques
NEXT STEPS
  • Study advanced circuit analysis techniques using Thevenin and Norton equivalents
  • Learn about nodal analysis for complex circuits
  • Explore the use of simulation tools like LTspice for circuit verification
  • Investigate the application of mesh analysis in circuit design
USEFUL FOR

Electrical engineering students, circuit designers, and anyone involved in circuit analysis and problem-solving in electronics.

VinnyCee
Messages
486
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Determine voltages [itex]V_1[/itex] through [itex]V_3[/itex] in the circuit below.

http://img264.imageshack.us/img264/9311/chapter3problem161oz.jpg

Homework Equations



KCL, V = iR

The Attempt at a Solution



So I added some variables to represent currents and a super-node. The variables are in red and the super-node in light-blue.

http://img264.imageshack.us/img264/1875/chapter3problem16part21ki.jpg

[tex]V_A\,=\,V_2[/tex]

[tex]V_3\,=\,13\,V[/tex]

[tex]I_1\,=\,\frac{V_1\,-\,V_3}{\frac{1}{2}\Omega}\,=\,2\,V_1\,-\,2\,V_3[/tex]

[tex]I_2\,=\,\frac{V_1\,-\,0}{1\Omega}\,=\,V_1[/tex]

[tex]I_3\,=\,\frac{V_2\,-\,0}{\frac{1}{4}\Omega}\,=\,4\,V_2[/tex]

[tex]I_4\,=\,\frac{V_2\,-\,V_3}{\frac{1}{8}\Omega}\,=\,8\,V_2\,-\,8\,V_3[/tex]

Now I use KCL at the super-node:

[tex]I_1\,+\,I_2\,+\,I_3\,+I_4\,=\,2\,A[/tex]

[tex](2\,V_1\,-\,2\,V_3)\,+\,(V_1)\,+\,(4\,V_2)\,+\,(8\,V_2\,-\,8\,V_3)\,=\,2\,A[/tex]

[tex]3\,V_1\,+\,12\,V_2\,-\,10\,V_3\,=\,2\,A[/tex]

[tex]3\,V_1\,+\,12\,V_2\,-\,10(13\,V)\,=\,2\,A[/tex]

[tex]3\,V_1\,+\,12\,V_2\,=\,132[/tex]

And get the voltage equation from inside the super-node:

[tex]V_1\,-\,V_2\,=\,2\,V_A[/tex]

[tex]V_1\,-\,V_2\,-\,2\,V_2\,= \,0[/tex]

[tex]V_1\,-\,3\,V_2\,=\,0[/tex]

Now put into a matrix and rref to get [itex]V_1[/itex] and [itex]V_2[/itex]:

[tex]\left[\begin{array}{ccc}3&12&132\\1&-3&0\end{array}\right]\,\,\longrightarrow\,\,\left[\begin{array}{ccc}1&0&\frac{132}{7}\\0&1&\frac{44}{7}\end{array}\right][/tex]

So I get these for [itex]V_1[/itex] through [itex]V_3[/itex]:

[tex]V_1\,=\,\frac{132}{7}\,V\,\approx\,18.86\,V[/tex]

[tex]V_2\,=\,\frac{44}{7}\,V\,\approx\,6.286\,V[/tex]

[tex]V_3\,=\,13\,V[/tex]

Does this look right?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Yup, looks right to me.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K