Solving Confusing Indices in Operator Calculus

  • Thread starter Thread starter countable
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Confusing Indices
countable
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
Sorry if this is a stupid question but I really want to understand this.

If we have an operator that's defined in the following way:

D_\mu \phi^a = \partial_\mu \phi^a - iA^{r}_{\mu}{(T_r)^a}_b\phi^b

How would we go about working out:

D_\mu D_\nu \phi^a

What's confusing me is that the operator D acts on one component of the scalar (the gauge field) on the LHS, but acts on two components of the scalar on the RHS.

FYI: the "answer" is that D_\mu D_\nu\phi^a=(\partial_\mu{\delta^a}_b - iA^{r}_{\mu}{(T_r)^a}_b)(\partial_\nu{\delta^b}_c - iA^{s}_{\nu}{(T_s)^b}_c)\phi^c

How does the above expression come about?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The first thing to realize is that the your differential operators has two indices:

D_\mu \equiv (D_\mu)^a_{\phantom{a}{b}}.​

Therefore, the combination D_\mu\phi^a is really

D_\mu\phi^a\equiv (D_\mu)^a_{\phantom{a}{b}}\phi^b.​

With this in mind, it should be pretty clear that

D_\mu D_\nu \phi^a\equiv (D_\mu)^a_{\phantom{a}{b}} (D_\nu)^b_{\phantom{b}{c}}\phi^c.​

Does that help?
 
thanks that was a good explanation:)
 
I am not sure if this belongs in the biology section, but it appears more of a quantum physics question. Mike Wiest, Associate Professor of Neuroscience at Wellesley College in the US. In 2024 he published the results of an experiment on anaesthesia which purported to point to a role of quantum processes in consciousness; here is a popular exposition: https://neurosciencenews.com/quantum-process-consciousness-27624/ As my expertise in neuroscience doesn't reach up to an ant's ear...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
I am reading WHAT IS A QUANTUM FIELD THEORY?" A First Introduction for Mathematicians. The author states (2.4 Finite versus Continuous Models) that the use of continuity causes the infinities in QFT: 'Mathematicians are trained to think of physical space as R3. But our continuous model of physical space as R3 is of course an idealization, both at the scale of the very large and at the scale of the very small. This idealization has proved to be very powerful, but in the case of Quantum...
Back
Top