Discussion Overview
The discussion revolves around determining the period of the function cos(2πx)sin(2πx) and its generalization cos(2πmx)sin(2πmx). Participants explore different interpretations and calculations regarding the period of these functions.
Discussion Character
- Technical explanation
- Debate/contested
- Mathematical reasoning
Main Points Raised
- One participant questions the period of cos(2πx)sin(2πx), initially believing it to be 2.
- Another participant states that cos(2πx)sin(2πx) can be expressed as (1/2)sin(4πx), leading to a calculated period of 2.
- A different participant argues that the period is actually 1/2, explaining that as x increases from 0 to 1/2, 4πx increases from 0 to 2π.
- Another participant provides a general rule regarding the period of sin(nx) or cos(nx), stating that the period of cos(2πx) is 1, and thus the product has a period of 1/2.
- One participant expresses agreement with the 1/2 period conclusion but notes that their graphical observation suggests a period of 2.
- A participant who graphed the function asserts that the period appears to be 1/2, while acknowledging that 2 is a multiple of 1/2.
- A participant shares a plot of the function, contributing to the visual aspect of the discussion.
Areas of Agreement / Disagreement
There is no consensus on the period of the function. Some participants argue for a period of 1/2, while others suggest it appears to be 2 based on graphical analysis.
Contextual Notes
Participants reference different methods of determining the period, including algebraic manipulation and graphical representation, which may lead to varying interpretations.