Solving Cosine of 330 Degrees: Conjugate Method vs. Alternative Method Explained

  • Thread starter Thread starter Hammad Shahid
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cosine Degrees
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on solving the cosine of 330 degrees without a calculator, highlighting the use of the conjugate angle method, which yields a result of 0.866. A participant initially miscalculates using an incorrect approach, resulting in -0.5, and expresses confusion over the discrepancy. It is clarified that the participant was inadvertently calculating sine instead of cosine, emphasizing the importance of understanding the unit circle where the x-value represents cosine. The conversation concludes with an agreement that viewing angles in relation to the x-axis is crucial for accurate calculations. Understanding these concepts helps clarify the relationship between angles and their trigonometric functions.
Hammad Shahid
Messages
64
Reaction score
3

Homework Statement


Cos(330 degrees)
*No calculator

Homework Equations


(a^2)+(b^2)=(c^2)
Cos=(delta x / hypotenuse)

The Attempt at a Solution


Hi guys, so today at school, the teacher was doing a problem which stated to solve the cosine of 330 degrees. The teacher used the conjugate angle method to get the answer 0.866.
However, I do not see what is wrong with my method (link to image will be below), because when I do it, I get -0.5. Please help, this has been frustrating me- I do not get why the conjugate method works, but not the one I used.
How I did it: https://imgur.com/a/Vp3ne
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hammad Shahid said:
delta x / hypotenuse
You are taking ##\delta y## divided by the hypothenuse ... You are computing the sine, not the cosine.
 
Orodruin said:
You are taking ##\delta y## divided by the hypothenuse ... You are computing the sine, not the cosine.
Sorry, I meant in relation to the angle, like such: https://imgur.com/a/hdKyE

IDK, it’s something my teacher showed me last year, like tangent = (y/x), or opposite/adjacent.
 
You really should not be using those terms for angles larger than 90 degrees, it will most likely just confuse you.

What you are computing is the sine, no matter how you frame it. The easiest way to remember things is to look at the unit circle with the angle ccw from the x axis. The x value is the cosine and the y value the sine.
 
Orodruin said:
You really should not be using those terms for angles larger than 90 degrees, it will most likely just confuse you.

What you are computing is the sine, no matter how you frame it. The easiest way to remember things is to look at the unit circle with the angle ccw from the x axis. The x value is the cosine and the y value the sine.
Hmm, okay. However, wouldn’t that then technically be the same as cosine of -30 degrees?
But over here, 330-270=60 degrees.
So the only logical thing I can think of is that I have to view the angles in relation from the x-axis, Am I correct in saying that?
 
Hammad Shahid said:
But over here, 330-270=60 degrees.
So the only logical thing I can think of is that I have to view the angles in relation from the x-axis, Am I correct in saying that?
Yes. View it in relation to the x-axis.
 
Ok. Now that I think about it, it makes a lot of sense.
Thank you both of you guys.
 
Hammad Shahid said:
Hmm, okay. However, wouldn’t that then technically be the same as cosine of -30 degrees?
Yes. Both sine and cosine are periodic with a period of 360 degrees.
 

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
5K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
9K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K