Solving Drug Modeling: 130 micrograms of Thyroxine Needed

  • Thread starter Thread starter linyen416
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Body Modelling
linyen416
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
Could someone please help me urgently?
The problem is: 130 micrograms of thyroxine is needed in her bloodstream. Her doctor prescribed one 100 microgram ,thyroxine tablet to be taken every day. If the half-time of thyroxine is 6.7 days, either justify that the uptake of thyroxine by the body and clearance through the liver fits a model similar to that for renal clearance stated above, or modify the mathematical model (do not alter the dosage or prescribe other drugs) so that it fits the given conditions.


I know already that to model the renal clearance, it would be a geometric progression with each term having exponential decay:
so
amount in body = De^(-0.10nT) + De^(-0.10 (n-1)T) +De^(-0.10 (n-2)T) +...+ D
because k = -0.10 So this is a geometric progression, defining variables: T = time interval between intakes, D = initial dose, n = nth number of dosage
But I know it is not as simple as this becasue this only modesl the renal clearance and not the absorption of the drug by the body. Could you please help me out? I don't know what I can do to the model to make it fit those numbers (100 per dose , resulting in 130 all the time in the body)

I also don't understand how you found long term amount of drug in the body using the initial dosages using a spreadsheet. If possible could you explain to me how you set out the spreadsheet? Becasue what I did to find the long-term saturation level was to take the sum to inifinity of the terms of that geometric progression.


This problem is quite urgentso appreciate ANY feedback! Could yopu please help me out with the developemtns of the model to fit those numbers?

-thank you kindly!
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
##S(n)= 100k \left(n +2 - \dfrac{1-q^{n+1}}{1-q}\right)## is the total amount of substance, where ##k## is the daily absorption rate and ##q=2^{-\frac{1}{6.7}} \approx 0.9##.

Hence there is no stable amount, because the decay rate is much slower than the intake rate.
 
Actually, there's always a stable amount if the drug eliminates with some half-life (1st order kinetics). The "half-time" with which the steady-state amount is approached is the same as the elimination half-life. With a 100 mcg tablet every day and ##t_{1/2}## of over 6 days , the steady state amount (taken to be either the maximum or minimum amount during each 24 hours between doses) will be much more than 130 mcg. Are you sure that the required final amont is in micrograms and not in milligrams?

Of course, the human body itself produces thyroxine, which complicates this calculation, but let's assume that it's a patient whose thyroid gland has become completely inactive because of some disease.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
Back
Top